Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
14. The fact is, that it is very good rhetoric and I agree with everything stated
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 10:32 PM
Apr 2015

I applaud the sentiment but find it hard to believe that anything will come of it beside perhaps some "calls" to raise the tax rate a few % on high earners without ever addressing the capital gains tax issues at the heart of much of this. At least not from a Rubin/Summers economics proponent,

I also see no ideas addressing her "concern" regarding the 300:1 earnings ratio - I guess (insert your plan to address this issue here) is my most appropriate response regarding that bit of rhetoric.

Good rhetoric, absolutely no substance.
I agree with the message, a good campaign strategy IMO to mirror rhetoric made popular by Elizabeth Warren.

If she means any of it I expect to see ideas on how she would go about making the big earners pay big taxes relative to the middle class earners she referenced as well as a plan to regulate or propose some other solution that would achieve a fairer CEO to typical worker ratio.

I hope to some day (and I know this is crazy dirty hippy talk) also, just once, hear her acknowledge, even in passing, that there is a huge bunch of poor people out here, a demographic growing rapidly, that are below the middle class.

Maybe even (dare I beseech the Goddess) propose plans to help the majority of us poor, disabled, and working impoverished as well as the middle and up (if you would please Hill)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Hillary Clinton Blasts Pa...»Reply #14