|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:06 PM Original message |
US Treasury seeks probe into papers taken by O'Neill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fertilizeonarbusto
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. What about Valerie Plame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cthrumatrix
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. nope...this is about the documents...not about the content... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
39. yeah it sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. They can't find time to investigate the outing of a CIA agent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbfam4
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Interesting, isn't it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. Good, Keep it in the headlines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skypilot
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, if we're lucky... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. If O'Neill stalls or puts up a fight it will stay in the news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
49. It reminds me of Fox News suing Al Franken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. And it took six months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbfam4
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. amazing........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbfam4
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. that old memory hole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. In the Oval Office, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. ok, so this is step 2 in Rove's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
46. Some Web-Site was already publishing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hellhathnofury
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:30 PM Response to Reply #46 |
90. That trip brought about the weak AID's initiative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fearnobush
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
106. There is no Liberal Media. Only the Rove Media. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. A better question is "why is the document classified?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbfam4
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Ma be it is or maybe it isn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneighty
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Perhaps a declassified document was re-classified as classified,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
51. Bush has done something similar to that before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
69. Isn't this the same document that was on DU months ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:55 PM Response to Reply #69 |
79. Judicial Watch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #79 |
96. Sounds about right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WherestheOutrage
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. We'll get you O'Neill!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:20 AM Response to Reply #12 |
127. And your little dog, Toto, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JailForBush
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. That Blew Me Away, Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. They mentioned they were on CD-Rom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. They said he asked what he could have and they told him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muchacho
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Bad strategy = Great sales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Better get that book before Bushie's try to get it yanked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I just called Barnes &Nobles they will have it tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. I'm going to be at a B&N too tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enraged_Ape
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. Don't sweat it; the big chains need to know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peterh
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Hmmm….taking bets that the offices/homes of…. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
57. Suskind was a reporter for the WSJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
October
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
92. What would make O'Neill take such a risk... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pikku
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:02 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. Serious illness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
October
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 10:01 PM Response to Reply #99 |
114. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
93. IT WAS A COVER SHEET ONLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fearnobush
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:16 PM Response to Reply #93 |
110. Until a well timed terror attack or war that breaks out in the next |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
97. He should scan them and put them on Kazaa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
14. Rove re: O'Neill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneighty
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
17. Poor Bush* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pikku
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
101. Cons versus Neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. Er, correct me if I'm wrong, intel-heads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. that's not what it says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
70. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:07 PM Response to Reply #70 |
107. the key word there is 'promptly' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:06 PM Response to Reply #70 |
117. Hmmm..........These felons abide by laws that they choose, not our laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
banana republican
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
22. O'neill must be telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manix
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. Let the right-wing smear campaign begin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muchacho
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
24. fire with fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbperrin
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
29. Post the entire CD-ROM to the net! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
88. That would be a reasonable assumption. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fearnobush
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:10 PM Response to Reply #88 |
108. Amen to that !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emalejim9
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
31. There may be others to speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
murielm99
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I think you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
55. * sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
![]() |
Wed Jan-14-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #31 |
137. Hi emalejim9!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chookie
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
33. O'Neill and Suskind are not fools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. I don't know where O'Neil is coming from but wherever it is, I praise him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Exactly, and they certainly had to know what a splash it would make also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
35. This is going to boil this controversy even more!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
36. Will this be as BIG as the "Bush Knew" breakthrough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kainah
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
74. needs a catchy headline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
41. on CNN: a cover sheet was used on TV, no documents there (per CBS) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
42. We are teetering on the edge of a Watergate type constitutional crisis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. It is our turn to impeach this time isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:05 PM Response to Reply #44 |
52. Deleted message |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. "Swish" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
76. What is "swish"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number6
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:27 PM Response to Reply #76 |
119. where the hell did that come from ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:56 PM Response to Reply #52 |
80. Deleted message |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Maxrandb DID answer you, point for point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:06 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. No, he called me a repub and lead by republikkkkkkkkkkkkkans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 11:03 AM Response to Reply #84 |
134. Regret my insensitivity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
87. Deleted message |
DBoon
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:44 PM Response to Reply #52 |
98. Sounds like a.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:04 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Does it start with an "F" perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thor_MN
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:12 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. don't forget doing something to prevent executive orders from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logansquare
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:27 PM Response to Reply #44 |
58. Easy now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #58 |
73. Tombstoned for what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:54 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Read post #52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. #52 is a pile of blabbering accusation with no facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:01 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Uh... okeydoke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:07 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. gooder? A sarcastic response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. Much gooder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
59. Needs work.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #59 |
72. Cut the crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #44 |
60. why are you so angry? Repugs are put off with this anger/hate thing..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotTooPrettyBad
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #60 |
71. Who cares what repugs think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Wed Jan-14-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #71 |
138. 100% control by either party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:47 PM Response to Reply #60 |
123. ROFLMAO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dax
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
121. just gonna try.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #42 |
61. Yep, this is scarier than when it happened with Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:00 AM Response to Reply #61 |
124. Not to be too scarey, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelaque liberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
45. I can't believe that Suskind and O'Neill didn't get this cleared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enraged_Ape
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:49 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Oh, it was cleared all right. This was well planned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #47 |
95. I agree with you and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
63. Who said they didn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelaque liberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 10:49 PM Response to Reply #63 |
116. I'm saying that they did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
48. They're out to "Get O'Neill" Big Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #48 |
67. I know very little about what O'Neill said as far as I can tell so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
56. Is this about the "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts" document? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgrrrll
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:32 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. That's it! I wonder if this is a brier patch scenario. Why show a cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. This was a document of Cheney's energy task force I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Yep, they're luring the bushies in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haele
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
65. From what I could see, the papers shown were not classified - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
66. The page to the link has been taken down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:06 PM Response to Reply #66 |
85. Well it's all over the net now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
75. Just pull a Novak and refuse to name a source... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
78. Scare O'Neill is the name of the game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
89. As I said before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hellhathnofury
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
91. We need photocopies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #91 |
103. *print* *iron-iron-iron* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bubblesby2002
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
102. A quote from the *'s administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:58 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. He is the proverbial fly on the wall plus he is old & gray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pikku
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #102 |
109. Just remember that the same people said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chookie
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
104. Local Pittsburgh news reports O'Neill said he did it because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fearnobush
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:20 PM Response to Reply #104 |
111. Let us all bring down the "Chimperial Highness " this summer at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
112. Sure, let them have all they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
54anickel
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
113. Here's a new link to a longer story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:41 PM Response to Reply #113 |
122. Couldn't fish up that story from them links (yet) but did find this....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
115. This is a criminal coverup! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:12 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. Yes and we must have a big big investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaDUer
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:02 AM Response to Reply #115 |
125. Hasn't he always hid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number6
![]() |
Mon Jan-12-04 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
120. I knew that was coming ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #120 |
126. Silly comeback by the gang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sideways
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
128. The Bush Idiots Have A Tiger By The Tail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lowflyer10
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
129. This O'neill thing will go nowhere..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fearnobush
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. No way in GOP land would he disclose "SECRET" docs on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lowflyer10
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:51 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. You'd think anyone with half a brain wouldn't do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 12:58 AM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Surpriiiise! Clinton did it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lowflyer10
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #132 |
133. It's not that cut and dried..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zerex71
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
135. Let's see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Tue Jan-13-04 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
136. Oh lookie, the Karl Rove Revenge Machine.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC