Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mugabe sworn in after disputed Zimbabwean election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:23 PM
Original message
Mugabe sworn in after disputed Zimbabwean election
Source: CNN

President Robert Mugabe was sworn in Sunday after the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission declared he overwhelmingly won the country's disputed runoff election.

"I, Robert Gabriel Mugabe, do swear that I will well and truly serve Zimbabwe in the office of president, so help me God," Mugabe said at the State House complex in Harare, standing before a red-robed judge wearing a white wig.
...
The international community has roundly called the election -- allegedly marred by violence and vote rigging -- a "sham."

Many voters expressed fear of government retaliation if they did not take part in the vote to extend Mugabe's rule. Some said they were required to report the serial numbers on their ballots to Mugabe's Zimbabwe African National Union -- Patriotic Front.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/06/29/zimbabwe.sunday/index.html?iref=mpstoryview



Gee, what a fucking shocker. Brutally attack anyone who shows any signs whatsoever of supporting the opposition, and then bask in the "overwhelming" victory.

Goddamned fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. American-style democracy is spreading all over the world.
What further proof do we need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You have to be joking, right?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I don't recall where Bush lit opposition Democrats on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. What opposition?
Pelosi?

I would hope he wouldn't be so brutal, but he's hardly been put to the test by the more than loyal, almost sycophantic, "opposition."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Is that why Bush could not get through the thing he has wanted his whole political life?
The Democrats, in the minority at the time, prevented him from privatizing Social Security which was his one big goal throughout his entire political life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Do you have a link for privatizing Social Security being his one big goal?
He has left the federal government so weak as to be vulnerable to Grover Norquist's famous drowning in a bathtub. The country may be a pathetic mess, but it's not far from what Bush and Company had planned.

In the coming collapse, do you really think Social Security is going to survive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I am not going to be a cure to terminal laziness or ignorance.
However, what does it tell you that his first big push after winning re-election with the biggest Republican majorities under a Republican president since the 1920s was for Social Security privatization and that this has been the one issue that he has always talked about and stayed consistent on since at least 2000? If you have read anything about the guy you would know that ever since the 1980s when he met with one of Pinochet's economic advisers who told him about Chile's program of a similar nature to what he proposed, he has been apeshit crazy for Social Security privatization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yeah, he's been so unsuccessful getting what he wanted through
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 06:57 AM by Benhurst
Congress. Other than tax breaks for his rich cronies, stealing the country blind, shredding the Constitution, waging an illegal and immoral war, and even now having "our" Pelosi/Reid driven congress go along with the FISA compromise, he's been totally powerless.

Cheney's agenda is still being pushed through. And Social Security will fall victim to the coming economic collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomnorth Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Bush did not
Because he did not have to. That doesn't mean he WOULD not, if need arises. People are already so controlled trough indoctrination et cetera "soft power" that there is no need to use physical power to control people and their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. That is trivializing the problems of Zimbabwe IMO.
Bush got himself installed as president by very dodgy means, when the legitimately elected president was Gore. However, he and his gang did not go around murdering his opponents and setting fire to their family members and making death threats against voters if they voted for Gore.

'American-style democracy' in the Bush vs Gore sense is very common across the world. Corruption 'rules OK' and without much check in many countries! It was particularly shocking in America, both because America is the world's most powerful country and the whole world is affected by who is president, and because it has a great and long-standing tradition of democracy and constitutional law, and one would have thought such things would not happen there. But corruption and fraud and undemocratic government are not unusual in the world (sadly!) Mugabe is exceptional, even among dictators, not for his fraud, but for his absolute brutality to his country's citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Without trivializing the horrors going on in Zimbabwe,
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 07:20 AM by Benhurst
we really have no idea how far Bush and company were willing to go when they staged their coup.

The United States folded like a cheap tent.

A million dead Iraqis civilians might give some indication of how ruthless our current rulers can be, however.

See: http://www.alternet.org/rights/89834 /

The coming election should be interesting, especially if the powers that be want to hold on to power. If so, we'll have our third stolen presidential election. Not to worry, though. The American people won't even manage a protest march, and violent suppression will not be necessary, just a round up of the usual suspects, at most.

There is always the chance, though, they will decide it's better to let Obama take a Carter like fall. How many Americans remember that Ford as president was wearing WIN -- whip inflation now-- buttons for the inflation Carter was later conveniently vilified?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Mugabee was pulling this shit well before Bush was president
Do some research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. pity there is no oil in Zimbabwe n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sbyte Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Other side of the story....
Zimbabwe: UN blocks British, US attempts to halt run-off

http://www.trinicenter.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1869

Britain, the current president of the Security Council, tried to use Belgium to halt Friday's presidential run-off election and illegally install Tsvangirai as president, but South Africa's Ambassador to the UN, Mr Dumisani Khumalo, blocked these attempts.

Associated Press reported that the US and France also tried to include in the Security Council statement language asserting that Tsvangirai should be considered the legitimate president of Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe's permanent representative to the UN Ambassador Boniface Chidyausiku said submissions by South Africa and Zimbabwe convinced the 15-member Security Council that it would be legally improper to halt the run-off and install Tsvangirai
--------------------------------
As if you didn't know there are two sides to every story.

Bringing you balance to the news,,, (where did that come from? )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I hope you are being sarcastic
linking to articles with quotes by Zimbabwe officials blaming the violence all on the opposition removes even the slightest hint of credibility.

Mugabe is a fool. To try to pull this type of sham election in an era of mobile phones, text messaging, cell phone cameras and instant worldwide communication was foolish. He is showing his age with his lack of knowledge of the internet age. It must be rough these days to be a traditional style dictator. He can certainly try to prevent information from getting out but with just about all the tactics of him and his murderous thugs out there for everybody to see, it has obviously failed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. There are Mugabe defenders on DU
For some people, all they need to know is that someone doesn't like Bush, or is anti-West, and that's good enough for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. How distasteful
But I am glad we allow all sorts of viewpoints on this forum. Keeps discussions lively and allows for learning things that one would not learn elsewhere. My instinct is to read a post that would defend whats been going on there and get angry. I am glad though that I get the chance to read something that can inflame my sentiments. Some people like forums where everybody agrees with them or the posts are deleted. <Cough...err.....FreeRepublic....>

I am glad this is not that place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Some points of view aren't welcome in rational debates.
For example, I am glad we don't have Holocaust deniers on this forum, that I know of. I don't take the post-modernist view that all viewpoints are equally valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. I agree
I also have limits. Mugabe support approaches that limit for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. And if a Bush supported politician pulled a similar stunt they'd be screaming bloody murder
Gotta wonder how they reconcile the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sometimes the other side of the story is not legitimate.
This case is a perfect example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. ABC News had a story
Can you imagine? ABC reported that Mugabe was sworn in today before a small hand-picked audience of military people and supporters. I find it completely astonishing that ABC would notice such a thing. They've been totally oblivious to such things in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. When Mugabe attends the ANU, they should seize him and arrest him for crimes
against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jun 09th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC