Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need link to Inflated GDP Numbers Accusation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:24 PM
Original message
Need link to Inflated GDP Numbers Accusation
Some time this week I read a comment by a (Goldman Sachs?) analyst that last fall's GDP numbers were inflated, and that the reason we haven't seen the jobs everyone expected after those numbers is because the numbers weren't real.

I thought I'd saved it but can't find it, and the story hasn't made it to the front page because of other events.

Can anyone help me find that article?

Thanks so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. This Miami Herald article might be it.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8258155.htm

<snip>

A growing number of discrepancies are emerging in America's economic numbers, including a dramatic over-estimation of manufacturing output. The latest analysis from Goldman Sachs suggests that the US economy may have grown by only about 2.2 percent in the year to the fourth quarter of 2003, considerably less than the official 4.3 percent.

Jan Hatzius, a senior economist at Goldman Sachs, has added his voice to a growing band who believe that the growth figures are overstating the true recovery of the US economy. Errors in calculating manufacturing output and income growth explain why unemployment, on all measures, has consistently disappointed the markets in recent months, the research claims.

Hatzius said: "Over the last year, the official data show real gross domestic product (GDP) growing a sturdy 4.3 percent. Yet, non-farm payrolls are up only 0.1 percent. It is hard to overemphasise how unusual this combination is."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good timing, I just finished reading that article. Here's the link
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8258155.htm

and for those who have not read it here's a couple of paragraphs

Mar. 21 - America's buoyant economic recovery could largely be a statistical illusion, according to research released this weekend. Last year's growth may be half the official figure, which would explain the lack of job creation which is damaging President Bush's re-election chances.

A growing number of discrepancies are emerging in America's economic numbers, including a dramatic over-estimation of manufacturing output. The latest analysis from Goldman Sachs suggests that the US economy may have grown by only about 2.2 percent in the year to the fourth quarter of 2003, considerably less than the official 4.3 percent.

Jan Hatzius, a senior economist at Goldman Sachs, has added his voice to a growing band who believe that the growth figures are overstating the true recovery of the US economy. Errors in calculating manufacturing output and income growth explain why unemployment, on all measures, has consistently disappointed the markets in recent months, the research claims.

Hatzius said: "Over the last year, the official data show real gross domestic product (GDP) growing a sturdy 4.3 percent. Yet, non-farm payrolls are up only 0.1 percent. It is hard to overemphasise how unusual this combination is."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks a million . . .
. . .to both of you!

I'm definitely going to save it this time. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmayer Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it's of passing concern.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 03:42 PM by cmayer
The 3Q results were an incredible 8.2 percent. They were quarterly results only and reflected the results of tax rebates and military spending on Iraq. They could not be used to judge future quarterly results.

Today the 4Q results were finalized at 4.1 percent, which is pretty good.

There may be job growth soon. As a tactic, if it happens, we will have to emphasize the quality of the jobs created. (High wage/benefits vs. flipping hamburgers.)

(on edit) Someone posted the link while I was typing this. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But doesn't it show the Bushies
messing around with reports to make themselves look good - - yet again?

Thanks for you response, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmayer Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I would guess that it is not actual manipulation
I read the Miami Herald article and my take on it is that the figures are not wrong because of sinister manipulation. It seems that the economy is doing some things that have never been seen before and the old standard measure is no longer accurate.

But of course, it could be manipulation, if they thought they could get away with it. And they seem to think they can get away with anything.

Nah...I'll go with my first answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC