I hate to say this........

[onecitizen]

I really do. I don't like to act ugly. BUT I CANNOT stand Andrea BITCHELL. And she's on Mathews EVERY damn time! Go home to your old man Andrea. Your REAL old man.

[wurzel]

1. She sure is one sour lady.

[Auntie Bush]

7. And I also hate to say it.. but she's really ugly.

[wurzel]

10. Inside and outside.

[NYC Liberal]

2. Hmmm...

[PROGRESSIVE1]

3. ewwwwwwwwww!

[onecitizen]

11. hehehehe.......... nt

[leftofthedial]

4. if there is less insightful "analyst," I don't know who it is

Not only do I disagree with her incessant corporatist, big capital spin, but she is BAD at it.

[spanone]

5. I heard her say that Kerry used cheap politics.....a total shill.

[onecitizen]

12. I know.......

that is what pushed me over the edge tonight. She's getting desperate re: bush may lose!

[KharmaTrain]

6. Conflicted...

She and hubby Al have been played by this regime like violins. Remember how Al all but kissed Bunnypants ass when he came in "I like this man" crap to make sure he got another term at the Fed. He also stood silent as Harvey Pitt almost destroyed the credibility of the stock market (anyone remember that name???).

Mitchell-Greenspan is looking at a career that's quickly running out of options. She's no longer a "looker" or offers a personality of substance (example: Jane Pauley) and probably will be hiding in some think tank or academia in a few years. She's hanging on and needs access to have any chance of getting anyone at her own network to pay attention to her. Wanna bet when her contract comes up, she vanishes to cable news or out the door (depending on if Al's still at the Fed).

[onecitizen]

14. Bingo!! nt

nt

[Leilani]

8. She is not a political pundit

& is about as in touch with real America, as Shrub.

But, she knows the State Dept. That is her beat, she has covered it for years, & should stick to it.

[Lori Price CLG]

9. Yes, but at least they 'got rid' of Frank Luntz...

Luntz is a Reichwing maggot. MSNBC would introduce Luntz as a 'pollster' instead of 'Republican consultant/pollster,' in an effort to deceive the public.

Lori Price
http://www.legitgov.org/

[onecitizen]

17. Finally!!!

I wonder what made them do that NOW to Luntz? Are they just NOW figuring that guy out?

[liberal N proud]

13. I stopped watching Mathews.

He pissed me off one too many times.

[onecitizen]

15. I did too........

but I was in a situation tonight where someone else had the remote. grrrrr....I tried not to look or listen but that would have meant not listening to anybody in the room :-)

I will watch C-span for the debate.

[Bullshot]

16. She has enough pits in her face to hold a 5-day rain!

[onecitizen]

18. Oh my! nt

nt

[bushisanidiot]

19. Why doesn't Mathews ever have Liberals on? Ron Reagan is closest

he can come up with?? last night he had Pat Buchanaan, some Bush adviser, Andrea Mitchell and Tweety himself representing the repukes. I guess that was supposed to set up Ron Reagan as being a dem. representative and I don't think that's what his position is.

[texasmom]

20. She's the one who

went on and on with the "Clinton theft of White House items" stories in 2001. Even when the stories were being disproven, she held on and didn't back down, retract, or apologize. She was in a feeding frenzy. I will never forget that.

The other night after the Edwards-Cheney debate, she was so defensive of Cheney and his family. It wasn't impartial at all. She got very emotional.

My problem with her and Judy Woodruff and others like them is that if they want to be a partisan like Ann Coulter, fine. Just don't pretend to be a journalist.