|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:08 AM Original message |
The REALLY SAD thing about the role of Nader is that...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. If we take the number of Nader lovers and multiply by 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Please eitehr ignore the post or address the subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. It's all message, nothing more. It's an easy message now that Kucinich and then Edwards took their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. "Everyone is wrong except me" -Captain Ego |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
22. No it is a substantial message that has long been ignored by Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #22 |
41. You got it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. what "issues" is he bringing up that Obama and Hillary haven't addressed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. A few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Then why did he not throw his support behind Kucinich or Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. he basicvally said in the past that if Edwards were the nominee, he'd stay out of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. When was that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. On Hardball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:39 AM Original message |
Link? I'd really like to see that, it's suprising that was missed here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
49. Hardball, MSNBC...visit the website and find the transcript. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #27 |
52. That is not the same thing as endorsing Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
35. single-payer isn't going to happen overnight, Dems are pro-union, you think corporate personhood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #35 |
61. Byte me crank matey -- It's not about "Me" and I feel far from superior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
71. I think you're right about single-payer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
all.of.me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
48. Single payer! Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
5. Obama mentioned renewable power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Hillary mentioned clean Green energy a year ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
58. Ha ha---he is playing catch up to Hillary's comprehensive eviromental-green economy plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
70. I guess you haven't been paying attenmtion for the last 30 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. Try not making ASSumptions. I was referring to O. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. My mistake. I apologize. I misread your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. sorry for the snap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
6. I don't demonize him for his positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Best quote on Nader that I ever heard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
34. And you have been demonizing him for no good reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. Armstead, Now your thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Thank you.....I'm feeling like a voice in the wilderness at the moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
45. If he is all about issues then why.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
64. Um, there are several factual errors there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
75. You are not alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
10. He comes around every 4 years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. We may talk about those issue, but the candidates don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Did you watch Obama's Houston speech? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. yes I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Nader seems to agree with you about Obama's shortcomings. He said as much on MTP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. He did go after the GOp in very harsh terms on Meet the press AND... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Promote him elsewhere. He's done his damage. No difference between the parties except for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #43 |
74. Great deflection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Thanks. The personal attacks on me continue. I've said not one negative thing to you personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Oh and what is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. I'm just talking about the name calling. Everything else is fair game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. All right....Truce? (as I used to say to my brother) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Truce. You are a poster I respect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
47. YOU support Obama?? Really?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #47 |
66. Being honest is a weird way of showing support? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. I support Obama as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Rational context? What a novel idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. You have seen the environment here lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #47 |
91. one has to buy into the Nader Terror to support Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. Got a case of Deja Vu today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. all over again, yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. He has done so much for America in the past 7 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. This is why we will never have a viable third party candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #17 |
25. This is not the time to play the "values" game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CATagious (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #17 |
39. But the fact of the matter is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
62. How does one get a third party candidate? Well, first one needs a third party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
14. Of course, if Democratic voters had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
15. I'm surprised he's running again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
79. I think the Greens are running Cynthia McKinney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. Completely agree. I'm tired of the Nader fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
18. Fuck Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
19. Ralph took repiglican corporate money in 2004 to run,..wake the hell up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. suuuuree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
60. yep..rich repiglicans were bundling money for him.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
30. I am not going to vote for Nader but I support his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Tell me again what he's done in the last seven years when our country needed him most as an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formernaderite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. it doesn't matter what you perceive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Alert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
36. Yup, Yup, Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
40. Here is a picture of a "narcissistic piece of shit" from an earlier time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. John Brown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. looks like John Brown. That treasonous asshole deserved what he got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #51 |
67. Should every Confederate have been hanged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
44. Another Nader patronizing post, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
50. Incorrect. Kucinich and Edwards pushed a progressive agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Two variations of the same approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #54 |
77. BS. Both Clinton and Obama will give us Universal Health Care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Nader will have little or no impact on the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. What like a Wall Street securities speculation tax? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #85 |
90. Finding a balance shouldn;t be dismissed as unrealistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
53. Virtually ALL the attention Nader draws in the MSM is to his role as potential spoiler ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. I agree with you there....He should have run in the primary instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
55. He marginalizes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. I disagree with you on this....But since I usually agree with you, I'll leave it at that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
59. Nader uses his "issues" to pump up his ego and delusion. Modern Don Quixote tilting at windmills. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. don't matter. He is now in the race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. He still has to raise signatures to get on the ballot, right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. He has already won some states as a Green Party candidate--i do not know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
68. Nader is not at all interested in solving these problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
69. I used to respect Nader...now? where has he been last 2 years? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
92. there you go, being all rational and shit again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Time to rekindle the Sloth and Indolence Party and shame Nader and Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. I was looking for that banner the other day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. No. Didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
93. Nader is not an advocate for anything but Nader. I am not interested in anything he says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
94. For trying to rehabilitate Nader, you sir are on Ignore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. Aw shucks....Thank you. Bye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
95. I'm sorry but my hatred for the man makes rational conversation on my part impossible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Thanks for your honesty. I can understand your feelings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
102. obama folks are worried that nader will show people what a real progressive is like. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 25th 2024, 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC