|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:05 AM Original message |
Hillary Clinton leaves flowers for Our Lady of Guadalupe, asks ‘Who painted it?’ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArchieStone1
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. When a scientist proves to me that it was "miraculously" imprinted, then I'll believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Seems like reasonable assumption. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:30 AM Original message |
Remember that religion is all about faith not reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
95. Make shit up, call it religion, and get offended if anyone questions it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
176. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. and be sure to tell any woman you want to have sex with you're only doing it to satisfy your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArchieStone1
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I don't see the analogy there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. If you're going to be a Reductionist and insist on applying it to all situations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArchieStone1
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I still don't see how the two situations compare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
45. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
65. Oh SNAP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
181. Apply it to personal life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
91. The image of Our Lady of Guadalupe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
156. Lol, that gets 'em every time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
178. Wait, did you just equate romance/seduction to religion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
190. what should a guy who's had a vasectomy tell them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
34. It doesn't matter if a human did paint it - it matters that the entire importance of this cathedral |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
136. This latest gaffe IS mind boggling-some rest & more time to do her homework might help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just-plain-Kathy
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #136 |
143. Yes, I always thought dignitaries had "people" who filled them in on.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 07:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
148. she's methodist. she might not be up on her catholic iconography. I bet she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #148 |
153. I agree. Hillary's a quick learner - just wish she'd do more to avoid such embarrassing mistakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 04:34 PM Response to Reply #148 |
160. She visited the cathedral before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 04:41 PM Response to Reply #160 |
163. yes I have. your tone is harsh for my remarks. I looked it up but I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #163 |
164. Sorry - the tone wasn't intentional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freemarketer6
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
134. I choose to believe the supernatural version. Such departures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LooseWilly
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 11:19 PM Response to Reply #134 |
182. Well, believe as you will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 11:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
180. you guys are gettin reel good at this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. This sounds like an attempt to crucify Hillary Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArchieStone1
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Consider the source: "Catholic News Agency" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. The right wingers are freaking out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. What if it had been written as, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I really don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
169. Same old crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
77. Quite possibly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a la izquierda
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
7. The eye phenomenon in the tilma is creepy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marylanddem
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. You saw your own reflection in Guadalupe's eyes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
83. Supposedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a la izquierda
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 07:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
150. Not my own...but supposedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArchieStone1
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Someone could have painted this in the eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:46 AM Response to Reply #7 |
20. It's definitely a painting. God told me so. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
104. No one ever said that she is stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
10. The Monsignor erred. Circumstantial evidence points to the Mother of God as the Painter. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. “you have a marvelous virgin!” lololol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. "Be a shame if anything happened to it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
39. I'm sure Hillary's brightest rhetorical rejoinders are ahead of her... at least I hope so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #39 |
107. I would read #18, but it was deleted/removed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Along with your nasty personal attack. Never mind... facts have way of surfacing again and again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. I am sure that that iteration will be deleted too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #113 |
121. lol! To my knowledge, facts quoted from Reuters are not in violation of DU rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. Jeez. And innocent question. How dare a SoS ask it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
18. Deleted sub-thread |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
105. To me the bigger faux pas with the Russian "button" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:29 PM Response to Reply #105 |
138. One would have to think Hillary can only get better from here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #138 |
159. I would hope so - if she sees these as problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #105 |
168. What, you expect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
21. Hey, I'm Catholic, and I didn't know the story behind it--but still, her staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
22. Whoops, somebody forgot to do their prep work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
23. She should have responded, "No, I mean *really*." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. You're ignorance is breathtaking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #42 |
55. But I AM trying to educate myself. Did you not read my post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:51 AM Original message |
Your comments are not about spiritual or the supernatural. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
117. Your arrogance and rudeness are beyond belief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #117 |
126. Specify an example of my "rudeness"in this thread. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Read the comment I commented on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Here's the entire text of my comment. Specify the "rude" part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doyourealize1
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 03:15 AM Response to Reply #55 |
145. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #145 |
155. Why? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
101. I think your "not a lot" guess would be very wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #101 |
127. Perhaps. Any stats on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #127 |
140. Palin's crowds were "immense"... compared to what? Kmart blue-light specials? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a la izquierda
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 07:54 AM Response to Reply #127 |
151. Um, I was in Guadalajara on the Virgen's day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #151 |
158. So... there aren't any stats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 08:12 AM Response to Reply #127 |
152. Do you know any Mexicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
24. How silly - she's not even Catholic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Neither is Obama. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:04 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:06 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Did you read the OP? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Yes, I did read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
26. White roses. Sweet. Your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:01 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Really? The media is going to be offended? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #27 |
46. It was sweet of Hillary to give roses. I do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
28. It doesn't matter how it really was created, what matters is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #28 |
44. Her image is as iconic as the Shroud of Turin is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:22 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. If it were condi or bush who made the mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. It may have been a Gaffe, but it was not a Sin, nor do I think the church leaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. No one said it was a sin or blasphemy, you need to stop exaggerating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. So do you need to stop with your exaggerating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 01:24 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. I'm not exaggerating, she made a huge embarrassing mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. She made an embarrassing mistake. Not a huge embarrassing one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. Wrong again, but that just illustrates your ignorance of the culture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:50 PM Response to Reply #53 |
142. Clearly NOT a sin. Just a stupid, but honest mistake. A simple apology should suffice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
78. "If it were Condi or Bush"..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Lol /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #78 |
139. No way, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
141. Exactly right-Hillary needs 2 apologize quickly 4 any slight & get this behind her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
32. The strange thing is that she added she had been there before in 1979 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
33. Who deleted this post? GOD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
35. I have never liked Hillary as much as I do right this minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:41 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. So you think American dignitaries should be douchebags to satsify your own need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:47 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Deleted sub-thread |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #37 |
185. Maybe you can tell me how... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
36. Is this the not-so-immaculate birth of yet another Hillaryism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
43. She probably asked who framed it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
47. I don't expect her to know every tiny little detail about everything, but maybe her advisors could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
49. The Secretary of State works for the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:37 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. This statement wasn't about official roles in the administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:39 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Then what does it mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:43 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TayTay
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. But the way to make the double standard go away is not to perpetuate it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. You're right, two wrongs don't make a right. Still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:45 PM Response to Reply #58 |
175. Monitored by people like you, maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
50. Hillary didn't commit a sin, although she may feel it was a gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
59. She is not Catholic, and to assume she would have that knowledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Sorry, that's not a valid argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
60. She's not Catholic, why should she know the story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
61. So how is it going over in Mexico? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 07:36 AM Response to Reply #61 |
149. My relatives don't care. They never heard about it until I asked them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
63. It was a good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
67. Looks like somebody is trying to re-start the old war: Hillary vs. Obama. EVERYBODY PICK SIDES!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl_interrupted
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Special Olympics, anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Ditto. I'm proud of Obama and Clinton, and I recognize that they're both human. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zuiderelle
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #67 |
92. Actually someone WAS trolling Free Republic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Yet you have no problem posting (and defending) Rush Limbaugh's teleprompter "joke" as an OP here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. Excuse me, Mr. Dragon, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #103 |
108. Try not pointing fingers at others when you're guilty of posting anti-Obama propaganda OPs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Just like Obama read the stimulus package before he signed it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 06:44 AM Response to Reply #110 |
147. Pres. Obama knows perfectly well what the stimulus package details are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #108 |
171. Hypocrisy Alert! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Sorry, unlike you, I don't browse Freeperville. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. CNA, Freepers, whatever............... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #102 |
172. Blah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #92 |
170. Actually, I'm really proud of some of the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cwcwmack
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
71. honestly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:14 PM Response to Reply #71 |
84. It was a clever question as the Priest got to say "God"--Now the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:01 PM Response to Reply #84 |
133. I think it could have been a clever winking question too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
72. Ouch, that's pretty bad from Sec. Clinton. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
74. PRIMARY WARS!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
75. Oooh, faux pas. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohheckyeah
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
79. I agree with Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 06:23 AM Response to Reply #79 |
187. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
80. As someone who has never been a huge Hillary fan, this is much ado |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
81. "If this was Obama the media would have crucified him. Remember the DVD incident?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
85. She should have read about it first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terri S
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
86. Interesting what the media chooses to cover, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
87. This is from CNA, but that didn't deter you. Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #87 |
115. NAFTA has eroded a good deal of Bill Clinton's popularity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:42 PM Response to Reply #87 |
174. All I know is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
88. Good for Hillary; she thinks rationally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. I think she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #89 |
99. Seems like she spoke in a perfectly courteous way, in any case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. Hello? It's not like she is an atheist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:08 PM Response to Reply #97 |
119. I know that; she's a relatively sober Methodist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #119 |
166. Oh, she wasn't disrespectful; HRC is not that type of person. However, a wee bit o'homework would've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #166 |
183. It wouldn't have hurt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #88 |
173. My first sentiment, too. I don't understand the outrage in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
90. Although members of my former parish did not know the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #90 |
112. Exactly - her staff should have told her as soon as she started to go there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Probably not a shock, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:07 PM Response to Reply #114 |
118. Do you know more about the source? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #118 |
122. They are the AP/Reuters of the Catholic world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. It was shocking the number of google links - yet not one was independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Hillary, the Department of State, and the Obama Administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. I was meaning if she DIDN'T ask the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
93. I am not shocked that Hillary was unaware of the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
94. seriously though, who did paint it ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 01:56 AM Response to Reply #94 |
144. Here is some info on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
96. There goes her invite to Notre Dame! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bottomtheweaver
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
106. Oops. Oh well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:02 PM Response to Reply #106 |
116. I'm sure she did, Hillary LOVES Mexican food. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bottomtheweaver
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 06:09 PM Response to Reply #116 |
120. LOL, that would explain her visit to King Taco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #120 |
125. Oh yeah, I remember those pics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bottomtheweaver
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. In that case I hope she got some good mole enchilladas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. I like mole too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #132 |
177. I like your strategy........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 10:28 AM Response to Reply #177 |
188. Who, moi????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 03:19 AM Response to Reply #120 |
146. king taco is so good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #146 |
154. Is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
109. Deleted sub-thread |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
135. Hillary needs to educate herself more about the places she visits to avoid embarrassment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Mar-29-09 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
137. I'd like to know who painted it, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demokatgurrl
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 04:40 PM Response to Reply #137 |
162. I would too- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
157. Well, I think the exchange was funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
161. She probably should have read about the mythology beforehand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
165. "you have a marvelous virgin!” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
167. The Myth of the Virgen of Guadalupe (Islamic image from Spain, not Mexico!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Mon Mar-30-09 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
179. Well, the story is certainly making the rounds of the right wings blogs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
184. I've never heard of Catholic News Agency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmilyAnne
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 04:28 AM Response to Original message |
186. Puhleaze! I am half Mexican and have lived in Mexico City, visiting this shrine many times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #186 |
189. Right on!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
191. I expect this from Homer Simpson, but America's top diplomat should be better informed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #191 |
192. Clark, give it up.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #192 |
193. Beacool, why are you always harassing me/trying to start a fight? The primaries are over, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #193 |
194. Ahhhhh, but you never seem to forget it................ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Mar-31-09 11:48 AM Response to Reply #194 |
195. That's untrue. I've long moved on and am enjoying the Obama Presidency immensely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC