|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:20 AM Original message |
Can someone explain to me why buying carbon offsets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. And whoever answers, I'd like to know what "carbon offsets" are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Thanks for the info, NYCGirl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Thanks. I figured I was the only one who didn't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
3. It is just another $$$$ scheme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gilpo
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's what one does when one has reduced offsets as much as they can, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
5. Basically your paying someone else to reduce their output. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. I think it also ends when there are not sellers and it is your turn to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
8. Pollution credits are a way of phasing in cleaner practices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
9. Not only have and eat the cake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
10. Carbon offsets mean that one pays more than necessary for burning fuel. The extra money goes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:33 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. But if you're wealthy enough, the cost won't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. And a way to help get alternative energy projects off the ground. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Nothing, except that any "sacrifice" won't be spread evenly if the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:41 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. But we have to do something while the hoped for changeover is taking place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. But what you forget is that the wealthy have a lower threshold for discomfort than the less well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Could be but so what? Doing the right thing for the wrong reason is still doing the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Why is it the right thing for the wealthy to tell other people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. It isn't. But then that isn't my perception of what is happening. It's not the wealthy telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:28 AM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Fast forward 30 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Throwing up our hands because of potential problems isn't a solution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Who said to throw up ones hands? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. No reason it has to be one or the other. It is all part of the mix. Caps are difficult but not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Name someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. James Hong. 36 months for multiple violations of CWA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. It is akin to a sales tax, exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
11. First and foremost the carbon market is a rigged game: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I suspected there was a downside. Thanks, PB. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
24. You are confusing several issues here. There are voluntary programs where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
50. Sorry, you're right. Though I made a point of saying I supported the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
25. It's not the idea but the implementation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
51. Exactly, the idea exists defenseless in a vacuum. For it to be succesful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
21. I Don't Like It Either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. With an effective carbon trading program, the "average worker" would get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Don't Buy It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. It is net carbon we are worried about. Yes you burn more carbon with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Here's The Thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Don't assume what I am willing to try or not try. Actually I think it could be privatized, with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymark
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
26. Only carbon neutral energy should be permitted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Nukes are not carbon neutral. It takes energy to mine uranium, transport it, process it, and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymark
![]() |
Tue Feb-06-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #30 |
55. We're doomed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. I don't drive a hummer or fly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Everyone leaves some kind of carbon foot print. Some more than others, that's all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
29. It's slightly better than nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
36. It reminds me of the Civil War era... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dunedain
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
37. Hey there Martin Luther |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gilpo
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Hi Dunedain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
38. It doesn't do a damn thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Actually if you look at the link in post # 6 you will see that is not what it is at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gilpo
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. Can you think of a better way to pool resources? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
39. Because it's FAR preferable to the alternative, which as you know is NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Mon Feb-05-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
52. A primer in pollution control -- here's how it works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC