|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:14 PM Original message |
Speaker Pelosi Must Be Removed For Her Illegal Position on Impeachment Investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. No argument here. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
99. 'it would fail' she is so full of shit. I loathe her and have since 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. Support the woman running against her, Golub for San Francisco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. The primary is over, I presume Pelosi won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
51. Sorry about that. Gosh you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #51 |
83. Obama, like Pelosi, opposes impaechment: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #83 |
157. Obama is the leader of our party and he should control the message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejbr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #157 |
171. The Constitution trumps Obama... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #83 |
188. Obama made that statement before we learned about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
159. Tombstone!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:06 AM Response to Reply #159 |
162. Golub is a Democrat running for Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #162 |
168. Not Any More, Sir: The Primary Is Over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #168 |
170. My mistake, and my apologies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. wow, I'm impressed, "talking points memo" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I guess no source is credible if it doesn't come from CNN or Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. you're all full of tricks aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
67. i knew this would happen as soon as GDP went away. sigh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. It's an editorial, not a news article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. the OP put "Talking Points Memo" because TPM is credible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
147. DU considers TPM to be a credible source. Where have you been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 08:30 AM Response to Reply #147 |
156. which is why this poster falsely attributed TPM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. That's not Josh Marshall's opinion, just some blogger named 'testing'. Pelosi has my support... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Damn the DLC! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Bullshit. The Speaker of the House is obligated to the House first and foremost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Ah, so she's compelled to push for impeachment herself? Not at all. Let the Dem caucus do it. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. As leader of the House, she took it upon herself to re-write the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. 'Impeachment is off the table' does not equal 'I refuse to impeach whatever the evidence'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. That's exactly what it equals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. That's not what I said. And the House IS moving already-you may have noticed Wexler and Kucinich...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
45. That for Nancy take take impeachment "off the table" is exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. No, she's saying "I won't schedule a trial". Because she hasn't seen a motion to impeach in the HJC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. H.Res 333...when is Cheney's trial scheduled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. So she should unilaterally take it out of committee, herself? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Absolutely. If she cared about the Constitution, she would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #65 |
77. she sure as hell doesn't have the power to order Conyers to start hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. She could try picking up the phone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. She has the power to order him not to, though, doesn't she? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #81 |
92. Nope. She doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Nancy Pelosi has OBVIOUSLY strong armed Mr. Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. I suggest you don't know Mr. Conyers that well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Because Mr. Conyers has much more influence to lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:28 AM Response to Reply #100 |
154. Pelosi alone cannot remove Conyers from his chairmanship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #92 |
105. Correct - that's the Constitutional path to impeachment. Nary a pitchfork to be seen. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. And she won't see one because she has explicitly told Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #63 |
88. "She explicitly told Conyers not to allow it" - this is an unproven (and incorrect) assertion. Cite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. Compare and contrast Nancy's talking point "We'll impeach them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #93 |
102. You stated that she 'explicitly told him not to hold hearings' and you have no proof. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. His parroting her talking points is proof. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Okay, so inference is now legal proof. Tell me, doesn't THAT hurt the Constitution most of all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #110 |
117. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. 'declaring victory whilst departing the field' - a sad debating tactic, for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. I've committed to this field until Bush is in jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Whether he used her 'talking points' or not in no way proves your point. That's the (your) error. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:37 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. When John Conyers starts tell us we can impeach at the polls, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #123 |
191. Impeachment of the polls will not establish a record of the crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. actually -- that's exactly what it's meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Actually, it's not. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
54. Unless her agenda includes protecting the enumerated powers of Congress, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
116. Circular reasoning and a dose of utter nonsense just to add a little bite... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
76. I'll deny that she re-wrote the constitution. That's nonsensical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #76 |
85. Thank you. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #76 |
89. Except that it has been on the table, for a year, regarding Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #76 |
112. "...and the House has chosen, thus far, not to exercise it." Cough *BULLSHIT* Cough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #14 |
152. Bush kept her at arms length with a crucifix and garlic for 6 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InkAddict (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #14 |
166. Perhaps in so doing, she saved a spot on the map called Chicago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #166 |
174. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
189. MrCoffee, you are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Then why doesn't she come out and say what you said about her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Because that would weaken her power as Speaker. If it achieves critical mass, she can move it thru. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. There is no more critical mass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Well I don't accept that 'we' have no voice in government any more than Pelosi driving impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Whether you or I accept it or not, it's effectively true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Well, cynicism can be blinding and I'd rather look at what can be done. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #37 |
55. There's nothing cynical in pointing out that my district is not represented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #55 |
80. why don't the voters vote for someone who represents them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. See Election finance reform. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
62. until little old us can fund their campaigns, we are essentially mute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Yep. But we do seem to be getting better at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. thank you for the hope -- today is one of those days where I could use some extra... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. "They are attempting to appear independent of it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. It means that she can't appear 'gung-ho' for impeachment, she must be as dispassionate as any other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Gung ho? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:49 PM Original message |
How is she not upholding the Constitution? By not following your interpretation of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 05:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
143. No, she cannot drive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Comment from link and I agree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. Agreed - censure and impeach them and if possible, outlaw the Republican criminals from office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
70. Well it would not be to satisfy the party base... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
133. yes, and with worse democratic party sellouts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. K&R... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. We're here because no one confronted Bush over the faked WMD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
20. She took an oath to uphold the Constitution. Refusal to do so is treason! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. What Constitutional Oath is she refusing, exactly? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Oath of Office for Congressmen: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. "enemies foreign and domestic." doesn't get much clearer than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. And Bush's status as an 'domestic enemy' is a legal determination, to be made by hearings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Save the convoluted DLC bullshit for those ignorant enough to fall for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. Right, now I'm a pro-DLC supporter because just labeling someone a 'domestic enemy' isn't enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. ...and you have a bridge in Brooklyn you want to sell me. I ain't buying! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #52 |
60. Amazing what pre-conceptions will do to a person's willingness to consider others' ideas. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. no, you're just arguing the morally bankrupt side. but, carry on... please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Right-e-o. The 'morally bankrupt side' - WITHOUT pitchforks and torches and mobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #58 |
73. i'm not the one obstructing Congress. Just b/c Pelosi's a Dem, doesn't give her a lifelong pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #58 |
75. No Democrat doing their job needs to worry about "mobs" -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
98. Leave the party loyalty oaths to the Freepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. Right you are. Let the Constitutional process play out in the House. Pelosi needn't be a martyr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #104 |
114. Pelosi is doing her best to prevent the Constitutional process from taking place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. 'her masters in the WH'= ludicrous, demeaning, unfounded, self-destructive attack on a Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #115 |
119. Criminals and their appeasers get no respect from me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. 'appeasers' = Verrrry right-wing talking point 'frame' there, being used against a Democrat.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #120 |
201. Failure to impeach this president is appeasement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #49 |
135. bush "labelled' himself the enemy by his actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
86. Should Truman have been impeached for nationalizing the steel mills? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. These are war powers acts...there are much more direct grounds wtih Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. That didn't exactly answer the question I posed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #86 |
202. Truman was overruled by the Supreme Court. That was enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
71. "faithfully discharge the duties of the office" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #71 |
103. thanks for playing, but the constitution doesn't mandate impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #103 |
200. Actually, there is a strong argument that if the crimes of a president are to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. they never sign their oat that way when we finally discover Paloci's OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE she ca |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. and why Congress' approval rating is less than even Bush and Cheney's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Precisely! They're refusing to carry out their duties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. makes you wonder whose water they are carrying -- this is NOT a political victory for Pelosi... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. They're complicit in every Bush Admin crime they've turned a blind eye to and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. they're acting like hearings would harm them -- and there's no way that could be the case, UNLESS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Bingo! We have a winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. thankyouvurymooch -- :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #57 |
107. actually, they're acting like the public doesn't care about impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:22 AM Response to Reply #107 |
142. Is impeachment even one of the poll questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:00 AM Response to Reply #142 |
144. I don't know what polls you are looking at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #57 |
163. exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
44. What Constitutional Oath is she refusing, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #44 |
111. there is no one way to defend and protect the constitution specified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #44 |
183. You have cut to the core of the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
109. congress approval rating is low because the public is unhappy about a number of things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #109 |
204. The war. The economy. Gas prices. Health care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #20 |
165. The repukes lowered the bar by impeaching Clinton over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
40. This only makes the Freeper's fear of her even more laughable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. step down. step aside. that Congressional approval ratings are below Bush, it's b/c of Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
43. nancy paloci is OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, she should be removed from office, and charged with complicity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
48. negatory on removing nancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #48 |
68. Does anyone have that photo of Nancy holding hands with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. I don't have that one, but isn't this one just toooo precious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Ahhh.... the look of love. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #72 |
175. I actually like this one - she looks like she just zetzed him. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForeignSpectator (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #68 |
131. I don't understand why people aren't all over this quote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
78. What an idiotic idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
84. Does Kucinich have the spine to remove Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. He probably has the spine, just not the muscle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #90 |
97. and he doesn't have the muscle because the Democratic Caucus doesn't back DK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #97 |
113. Are you suggesting that the Democratic Caucus supports Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #113 |
126. you mean the people who elected her Speaker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:24 AM Response to Reply #126 |
153. She was elected Speaker? By the Democrats in Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
87. Agreed, but she won't be. Cowards are willing to let criminals walk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
101. Pelosi is clearly complicit with the bush cabal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
108. Is she Ms. Merican pie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
124. Malloy said that she threatened to fire Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
125. She must be removed like Gephardt was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #125 |
172. Gephardt was never removed as Speaker. He never served as Speaker in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
127. Getting Pelosi was/is a rip off - I'll take Cindy Sheehan in a heartbeat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #127 |
176. This picture pretty much sums up Cindy Sheehan's campaign: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
128. If she is protecting Bush she needs to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:14 AM Response to Reply #128 |
164. not only protecting Bush she is protecting herself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
129. K&R!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sunnyshine (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
130. K&R - Nancy pretended to be all for "holding them accountable" and was elected on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #130 |
167. silly campaign promises -- not unlike the gas tax holiday -- just gimmicks to the politicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sunnyshine (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #167 |
187. Typical and predictable. Will we ever have true representation? I've been waiting for 20 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
132. Four for the pseudolegal arguments: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
134. Agreed! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
136. I never understood taking impeachment off the table so.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
137. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
138. kr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
139. I support the lawful removal of the Speaker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:35 AM Response to Reply #139 |
140. so what? the OP is silly and so are the comments about removing Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #140 |
185. Silly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBInMaine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 04:15 AM Response to Original message |
141. Impeachment WON'T happen, the votes AREN'T there, put energy into winnning elections ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:12 AM Response to Reply #141 |
145. Some of us place country before party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:59 AM Response to Reply #141 |
150. Actually, The Votes ARE There |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Flag (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
146. Kick! Time to have Pelosi removed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
148. This is pretty much why we lose elections and never get anything done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happygoluckytoyou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
149. LOVE TO HELP----but im too busy fighting republicans right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pooka Fey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
151. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
155. Yet another distraction. The entire Democratic Party is ADD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #155 |
158. Actually, I think it's just the ones here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 09:03 AM Response to Reply #158 |
161. You are correct: I shouldn't impose on the population at large the behavior observed at DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
160. Someone needs a little Poltitics 101. This article relects a lot of ignorance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
169. Illegal?? HAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
173. I suggest you read Rules 1 and 2 !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
literacyadvocate (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
177. Perhaps removing her is an impossibility; but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #177 |
179. Kucinich doesn't have the balls to try to remove Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
178. ROFLMAO!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
180. The worst possible time.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rabies1 (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
181. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
182. Fuck Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff30997 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #182 |
195. "What's she hiding?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladywnch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
184. frankly, I don't whether he is impeached or not. but HE MUST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
186. Sorry, if you want to see the chances of a democratic landslide disappear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #186 |
192. The latest polls indicate that 3/4 disapprove of Bush. If 100% percent disapprove and we try to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muryan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #192 |
199. You overestimate the number of idealogues in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
190. Pelosi is now denying We The People our right to a redress of grievance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wizard777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
193. Nancy Pelosi has no authority to countermand the US Constiution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #193 |
194. Neither does Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff30997 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
196. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
197. She didn't grow up in politics did she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
198. Hear, hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
203. She's been such a disappointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 25th 2024, 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC