grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 12:17 PM
Original message |
If we need to incorporate Tea Bagger ideas - let's kill the mandate, not Drill Baby Drill! WTF!!!!! |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 01:10 PM by grahamhgreen
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If you had listened to what the President said, you would understand.. |
|
that this plan has nothing to do with teabagger ideas.
I'm so glad I'm not a snap-reactionary, what's it like?
|
Gman2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Bogus. We need the mandate, or no end to pre-existing. |
|
The oil lease change matters not, for two years at least. All that area needs resurvey. It is a brilliant tactical move, largely symbolic. Taking the wind out of Rethug sails.
Give the man who has shown you strength, and progress a little fucking credit. All your way, or you campaign against?
|
grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Pre-existing clause is already law. there is no reason we could not get rid of the mandate and keep |
|
the pre-existing clause.
The mandate is against my best interest - as is the offshore theft of our oil.
If he feels forced to cave in to more teabag ideas - let's kill the crappy mandate, keep the reforms in the bill, and DO NOT drill, baby, drill.
|
Gman2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. You would be creating the mother of all federally unfunded mandates. |
|
And a soundbite that would bite off all our heads.
|
grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. No, the teabaggers and Repubs are AGAINST the mandate, and the mandate is to PURCHASE |
|
insurance - not purchasing it would not remove funding.
|
Gman2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I dont give a flying what the Teafluffers say. It is logic. |
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. So, is this like that chess game on HCR? nt |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. All the murdering necessary to maintain BAU. n/t |
Renegades of Funk
(118 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I like the idea of not relying on foreign countries for oil and other commodities we can produce for ourselves. Hopefully this is a part time deal, so we can focus on renewable energy.
|
grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Except that - this oil will be sold on the open market to China, etc, , so it will do nothing to |
|
reduce our foreign dependency.
|
Renegades of Funk
(118 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
kinda lame. At the very least it creates jobs, but that's it.
|
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-31-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Yes, from now on can we vote on which RW ideas we prefer?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 30th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message |