Reply #54: I guess that when it comes [View All]

[telamachus]

down to it I feel that it is an extreme measure when there are alternatives such as Honest labeling and even warnings. These are measures that I would gladly support.

I guess I am the type to error on the side of choice not restriction.

The laws of unintended consequences may apply here as well. If corporations are forced into the corner on this issue they may choose to reduce their products and their work forces in turn. Look at the case of the large bakery (forgot name) on the east coast (US) that close several factories as a result of loss of sales due to the Atkins craze.

It may be true that an alternative can be found but this will lead to high consumer costs and possible costs in grant from the government.

An approach that would force change over time thus limiting the potential economic consequences would be to insist on accurate labeling and even warning on food.

The EU has reached this compromise in regards to labeling GM foods. Let the consumers make the choice.

There are many dangers to consumers but one needs to look at priorities. There are ways of decreasing the use of TFA without the repercussions that come with a ban.

Trans Fats are serious as they not only contribute to coronary artery problems they can increase the likelihood of diabetes.