You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: ??? This confuses me. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
69. ??? This confuses me.
This is nothing new at all. Most homeowner's associations I know of in my area do background checks before allowing someone to purchase property. My own association does that, and we went through it, just like everyone else who lives here. You submit an application to the homeowner's association and they run a background check on you. You even pay for the "privilege." They have the right to refuse any applicant if they don't pass the background check and I'm certain they would reject anyone with a child molestation background, even though no children live here. The entire board of directors decides whether you get to buy. Most neighborhoods are just neighborhoods without homeowner's associations and there are thousands, upon thousands of them.

Do I feel elite living in a neighborhood with a homeowner's association? Not when you consider I live in a mobile home park and paid $23,000 for my property. We're not a gaited community, either. Right across the highway we have a regular neighborhood and regularly, from that neighborhood, we have teens coming over to break into our homes to steal TV sets and VCRs, so we are no safer for having no criminals in our small community, but at least we don't have to be suspicious of our neighbors, ranging in age from 55 to 90 something.

My son and his family live directly across the street from a "child molester." This is an attractive married woman with a son of her own who plays with my grandson. She has been released from supervision for her "crime." I have no idea what her crime was, but I suspect it was sex with an under-aged teenaged boy that took place when she was in her late teens or early 20's (she's only about 30 now) - maybe a 16 or 17 year old. No one considers her dangerous; her neighbors all know about her record and she is included in neighborhood activities. A child molester is not always a child molester, if you know what I mean. Cases need to be decided on their own merit and not under a "blanket" child molester label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC