http://www.seiu.org/2010/01/comprehensive-immigration-reform-would-increase-us-gdp-by-15-trillion-over-10-years.phpThe report, Raising the Floor for American Workers looks at the effects on GDP and U.S. wages of three different scenarios--
1. passage of a comprehensive reform bill,
2. creation of a temporary worker program, and
3. a mass deportation of today's 12 million undocumented workers.
If the U.S. Congress were to pass a comprehensive bill this year, it would increase the U.S. GDP at least 0.84 percent annually--amounting to a more than $1.5 trillion boost in GDP over 10 years!
On the other hand, a mass deportation would cost the U.S. a whopping to $2.6 trillion in lost GDP over 10 years! It would also reduce wages for higher skilled native workers and only provide a slight increase in wages for a small group of less-skilled native born workers. And the estimated $2.6 trillion loss in GDP doesn't include the more than $200 billion it is estimated to cost to deport 12 million undocumented immigrants.
The CAP report also looked at the economic ramifications of a temporary worker program--long championed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and their big business allies in Congress. Not surprisingly, a program that mirrors the failed Bracero program of our past--denying basic labor protections for foreign workers and blocking them from permanent residency--would significantly push down wages for native-born and newly legalized immigrant workers. As SEIU and labor groups have long posited, a revolving door of easily exploited, cheap foreign labor brings down wages and living standards for all workers.
Done right, the CAP report confirms, only comprehensive immigration reform will raise standards for all workers, strengthen our economy, and restore the rule of law for the long-term. The CAP report was released today in a press event with author Dr. Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see a study of something as complicated as immigration reform. IR is one of the those issues where people just "know" certain things are true, even if studies and research show that the opposite. It would be interesting to see is a conservative immigration organization like FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) have studies that show something different than the one referenced in the OP.
"Federation for American Immigration Reform spokesman Ira Mehlman said that even with legal status, many immigrants would continue to work in low-wage jobs, meaning their tax revenue wouldn't make much of a difference to the economy. Also, legalization would flood the labor market and drive down wages rather than increase them, he said." (
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-immig7-2010jan07,0,5871672.story) This article doesn't say if Mehlman bases his statement on some research or he just "knows" that it is true.