You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #95: Well maybe yes, and maybe no. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. Well maybe yes, and maybe no.
I'm not quite ready to give up hope yet, so I'm working from the basis that there is still a possibily of turning this runaway train around.

Here's the problem for the oligarchs --

For far too long they've posited home ownership as the route to financial independence. Upton Sinclair used it in "The Jungle," so this isn't a new, post-Reagan strategy. The aristos employed a lot of different tactics to do this. There were the old days of deed restrictions that kept neighborhoods "safely" white, so white folks would invest their money and pay their mortgages and their interest and their taxes. There were GI bill mortgages. And so on.

Now, some will say that private home ownership and the debt it involves is antithetical to personal financial independence. But private property is part and parcel of the capitalist (and even part of the socialist) ideology.

(Charlie Keating discovered that being a developer and making all the tons and tons and tons of money from selling houses was less attractive financially than being a hotelier, because then you maintain ownership of the asset while generating income from it. And that's the true aristo attitude.)

But the question then becomes, how do the current oligarchs safely switch course? How do they suddenly dismiss home ownership -- remember boooosh and his "ownership society"? -- as the foundation of the American economy without pulling down their own curtain and revealing the little bald man behind it?

I don't think they can come right out and throw all those homeowners over a cliff, even if they'd like to, because I think they know it will backfire on them. They don't really care about the peons, the peasants, the serfs and other little people, but they do care about avoiding armed insurrection.

Maybe they will go ahead and retroactively protect MERS and the banks and let middle- and working-class homeownership fade from the American scene. But if those people don't have a living room to sit in while they watch DWTS or Idol or whatever other mindless drivel passes for mass entertainment these days, then those people might be sitting around campfires and talking about how they got thrown out of their homes while the greedy banker pigs got bailed out.

Maybe.


TG, NTY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC