Reply #136: "Well, by all means, let's lock up anyone you think may commit murder!!" [View All]

[Corruption Winz]

Why do people think this is across the board?

What is so hard to understand about case by case? What I'm saying is SHE should be locked up. She likely committed a crime. All the players besides a black player (since she said her attackers were white) took DNA tests and all 46 tests failed to find a match. All were willing to take polygraph tests. The only DNA that could link anyone to this was so insignificant that tissue paper could have transferred it.

Some stated that if you wait too long, it inadvertently destroys DNA. However, she was tested hours after leaving the party. Not long enough to destroy DNA. Virtually all medical examiners say that if she were to have multiple amounts of DNA on/in her body, something stronger would have stuck. Nothing did.

"During Nifong's ethics trial on June 14, 2007, the complete DNA findings were revealed during Brad Bannon's testimony. It revealed, according to conservative estimates, that the lab had discovered at least two unidentified males' DNA in Mangum's pubic region; at least two unidentified males' DNA in her rectum; at least four to five unidentified males' DNA on her panties; and at least one identified male's DNA in her vagina."

Yet, you can't link ANY OF THIS to the Lacrosse players? Either she's lying or accusing the wrong people. In my opinion, she's lying. Beside the point.

All I was saying was that if she were lying, which I believe she was, she'd have been in jail and all of this could have been avoided. I said nothing about anyone else or locking anyone else up. Just her.

You can disagree with her lying and my belief that she is a liar. That says absolutely nothing about other people or locking them up without probable cause. Don't put words in my mouth.