Reply #15: Funnily "the economist" is concerned about those things [View All]

[sweetheart]

and has cast a rather dim view of bush's inability to add up the
dangerous deficit, combined with an aging population and what it
describes as a cumulative 70 trillion dollar shortfall when all the
social security obligations come due.

The economist is otherwise cowardly and, like rupert murdoch,
kneejerks to the warmongering side, totally betraying the liberalism
that walks with "political economy".

The economist also, based on current fiscal irresponsibility,
forecasts a necessary 20% drop in the dollar... hmmm.

THat is not calling the game the same... kerry is a clearly more
responsible long term development candidate.