Reply #6: Well, the only real fact you postualed is not true. [View All]

[Old and In the Way]

Clinton enjoyed majorities in both houses for 3 of 8 years. Republicans controlled both Houses from there on out.

Democrats won by 500,000 votes in 2000....Remember? Can you say Stolen Election? Now let's think this out. Let's assume Kerry wins this year.

How many Democrats will vote Bush over Kerry? 0
How many Democrats will vote who didn't vote last time? A lot
How many Independents will vote for Bush this time? A lot less than last time.
How many Independents will vote for Kerry? A whole lot more than Bush.
How many Republicans will vote for Bush this time? Less.
How many Repblicans will stay home? A whole bunch.

Next up for Bush:

9/11 Investigation - Did he really hit the trifecta?
Plame Investigation - Who's the treasonous bastard?
WMD Investigation - "Independent" investigation, my arse.

Kerry vs. Bush no Mas.

AWOL
Harken
9/11 - Bush reading goat stories than fleeing harm's way
Bush - I won the war. 500 Americans died and 10,000 Iraqi's so I could bag my defanged tyrant trophy. It only cost taxpayers $200 BB

Fiscal Stewardship -

Clinton: Turns $300BB Bush deficit into a $400BB surplus, 10 year projection of $1.4TT Surplus
Bush: $700BB deficits to date, 10 year projection min $2TT deficit.

So will George win? Not even BBV is going to save his worthless butt...I'm thinking 65/35 Kerry in a landslide repudiation of the Republican Party. I'm betting that his coattails are going to nuetralize DeLay's unconstitutional gerrymandering and Democrats regain majorities in both Houses.

Then the real fun begins.

Hillary maybe in 2012, maybe, but it's tough to take on the incumbant Veep.

:-)