You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: A few points. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. A few points.
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 12:30 PM by FormerDittoHead
I've been following this for years, from the Comcast side. I personally think "net neutrality" and PRIVACY to be a MUCH greater issue, however, it's very important.

1) DSL ain't Cable or fiber optic. Not even close.

I had DSL for ONE DAY and it pegged out at less than 1/6th the speed of Comcast. (DSLReports metered me at around 200kb. With Comcast I get streaming 1.5mb and max of 3.0mb.)

If you're downloading 150 gigs on DSL, you're downloading almost all the time. On Comcast, one month I downloaded 300 gigs and they shut me off, but in retrospect, I was grabbing everything I saw.

Back to AT&T. If you're using AT&T's "U-verse" service, the cap is the same as Comcast's well publicized and well noted 250gb. At those speeds you can go through 250 gigs downloading a few hours a day. (about 8 gigs).

Let's talk about bandwidth. A Hi-Def Netflix video eats up a more than a gig of bandwidth, and Netflix allows you 6 simultaneous connections per account. If you're a big family and if you're all watching Netflix / Hulu / Amazon you could go through that 250 gigs pretty quick.

However, I was told that UNLIKE cable, DSL is NOT "shared" (like Comcast) so the idea that heavy users effect the quality of service for light users is false.

Furthermore, and I just have to add this because I've never read this anywhere, if the issue is quality of service, then why count bandwidth at off peak (1AM-7AM)? If general bandwidth is anything like the traffic any of my websites, then the traffic goes down like 90% during those hours. Whose service are you hurting? Cellphones let you call for free on off-peak.

Also, MAYBE there would be ONE MONTH where the user may want to exceed the limit. If I used 100 gigs last month, why can't I "bank" the difference?

I agree with this being a danger, and that the way they're controlling usage is arbitrary, self serving and the excuses they give are false. But I can't help but say that if you're going to pick a battle, net neutrality is the one to go with right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC