You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: That would take an awful lot [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
sandraj Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. That would take an awful lot
of planning, coordination, luck, timing and many other things in the perpetrators' favor. And it would represent a huge failure on the part of our tough-talking war president who's supposedly made the world safer from terrorism.

To me, the real issue here is not postponement of elections, but three+ years of false alarms: fearmongering for the sake of power. The fact is, just about anything this administration says or does is made up of layers and layers of deception and false issues. In my opinion, we should shine a little light on the fearmongering before giving credence to Ridge's alerts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC