You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is enlightenment? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 03:45 PM
Original message
What is enlightenment?
Advertisements [?]
Is not the very purpose of having a mind and a live, to contemplate
the profound question, no? Attempting to write about it, the first
folly that words and the self that knows words, think it knows, as
knower and object in the deception of mind.

Do not all people live their lives measured against some invisible
semantic moral, ethical or something or other enlightenment? Surely
as easily as one can discern evil and that bad things are being done,
there is the same up-side ability to "know" enlightenment?

Is it just being really really smart?
Is it being profoundly loving?
Is it having magic powers?
Is it nothing, as in "no thing or experience"?

It is defined by englightened people as "life without thought".
Something direct, immediate, total, in and not in meditation, or all
of life is that meditation... even with the terrible fear-states,
contractions and contradictions of this world.

If it is true, and we better hope it is, that we are the enlightened
left, then we better dang well show some. If life is without thought,
and the self who writes, who knows language, is false, then knowledge
of words and langauge, surely is not enlighenment, then that all of
life "is" enlightenment, it is a false contradiction of the mind to
presume there is anything else. In that case, the entire world, every
instant in time is deeply alive and vibrant with deep mystical
richness, only richer and richer. Writing fancy verses or singing
great songs can lead to weaith, but the wealthy are not enlightened,
that whatever form of government has reduced us from respecting the
roots of knowledge (universities) as the basis of our culture,
and has replaced this with GOP mediocrity, wallmart wealth of cheap
plastic inauthenticity. How could such a culture based on plastic,
not crumble? How could a culture based on enlightenment not be quite
different?

And yet it is all enlightenment, and there is "no self",
"Tat Tvam Asi", "I am", "Sum ergo cogito",
"the father the son and the holy ghost",
knowable and unknowable.

"Who" knows enlightenment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC