You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Sure trial lawyers make huge amounts.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ChairOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. Sure trial lawyers make huge amounts....
Edited on Sun Jan-09-05 02:50 AM by ChairOne
... and you can thank the medical establishment for that as well. If doctor would police themselves, preventable medical injuries would decrease hugely. Without such injuries, there wouldn't be as many suits. Without as many suits, the lawwyers lose.

I am certainly not in the lawwyers' back pockets on this. It's the 500,000 preventable medical injuries I'm against. If the medical community were, contrary to fact, doing everything it could do to minimize these, then I might be open to other remedies for the medmal insurance problem.

But they aren't, in fact, doing everything they can. And that's just about as big an understatement as is possible to make. It's much closer to the truth to say that they absolutely refuse to do anything about them. Nothing except grab for Bush's anti-consumer-get-out-of-jail-free-card, of course.

The reports provided in this thread give all the numbers on the issue - I don't commit them to memory. There is no flood of malpractice litigation - to the contrary, doctors are the beneficiaries of a large claims *gap*. Very few frivolous lawsuits are filed, and essentially none get past the initial stages. There is no problem with "runaway" jury awards - after being reviewed by medical panels, awards are acknowledged as being commensurate to the harm done.

Doctors need to police themselves, plain and simple. I fully admit that they are the most *appropriate* people to do this. But the fact that they *refuse* to do this leaves it to the legal system.

But if you wanna stick to your guns, saying that it's just the lawyers, fine. Then get rid of the *reason* for the lawyers in the first place - the medical harm done to the public. Get rid of the 1% of doctors that account for 20% of malpractice claims (guesstimate numbers; consult the docs).

EDIT: You said: "Reform must balance out each side...". Wonderful. Give me the "balanced" reform that responds to 500,000 preventable medical errors. Tell me how limiting the harmed's right to seek redress "balances" 500,000 preventable medical errors. And then tell me about the "balance" associated with the fact that only 20% of doctors convicted of malpractice 3 or more times are sanctioned *in any way*, let alone barred from practice. Yah, let's be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC