You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Krugman the economist [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
lancemurdoch Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Krugman the economist
I've been reading Krugman's economics books for a while. In the 1990's he's written a few non-technical for the layman books which I've found interesting, he really explains well the course of economic thought from Milton Friedman through rational expectations to now in "Peddling Prosperity" (he also attacks not only supply siders, but Robert Reich and "strategic straders" as not being serious).

He knows his subject and he can express himself well. One thing he says is that as an economist, he has not shifted left or right, the ECONOMY has shifted in a direction that makes him change his views. In other words, he hasn't changed his mind about things, the economy has changed his mind about things. But he's concerned about more than our last recession and the current downturn as a result of that, he talks about Japan's malaise, the Asian financial crisis and so forth. The Guardian is correct when it says he was not so left in the early 1990's, he really wasn't, he was (maybe still is) 100% for free trade, unworried about unemployment in America as a result of jobs heading overseas, and praises sweatshops in Indonesia as being "better than nothing". Plus he is probably the most prominent liberal economist which is why his change in attitude is so interesting. I'm actually more interested in his changing ideas about the economic situation than his political ones, but of course, they're tied together.

I've been trying to ground myself in economics and decided to start with as far left as I could (Marx's Capital and his followers like Paul Sweezy and company) and move right after that to Keynesianism, then to monetarism. His books are so accessible though that I skipped ahead a bit. From far left to far right there is actually a lot of focus on the same issues, and some agreements on what plays out in a recession, although they disagree on why it happens and what can be done about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC