You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freeps Waking Up! Their comments on USSC's Pot Decision: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-05 02:17 PM
Original message
Freeps Waking Up! Their comments on USSC's Pot Decision:
Advertisements [?]
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Where does it say that in the Constitution? It should be up to the elected representatives of each state to make these laws not the Court. Another attempt by the court to take over the country.



15 posted on 06/06/2005 7:22:45 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; All
This ruling gives me bad mojo..



16 posted on 06/06/2005 7:23:03 AM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles, the earth/past to the groundhogs)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Nice of those justices to remind us that we live in a federal police state.

I can't wait for the public backlash that will follow if the federal government decides to start martyring patients over this decision.



17 posted on 06/06/2005 7:23:14 AM PDT by seacapn
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
It will be interesting to see what their Constitutional justification is. A strict reading of the Constitution would not only show that the federales have no authority to rule on marijuana, but that they have no authority over any drugs whether pharmaceutical or recreational. That's one of the powers which "are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people".

18 posted on 06/06/2005 7:23:25 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Republicans and Democrats no longer exist. There are only Fabian and revolutionary socialists.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Wolfie
Well, I guess they'll need to ban painkillers next.
Damn the sick people. FULL WoD AHEAD!


19 posted on 06/06/2005 7:23:43 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: YOUGOTIT
Constitution? They don't need no steenkin' Constitution!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC