You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

work dilemma - a question of principle - what should i do? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 11:30 PM
Original message
work dilemma - a question of principle - what should i do?
Advertisements [?]
The contract agency I've worked for for years gave me some paperwork to sign for a week long Flash gig at Microsoft (which is now over). I thought it was the usual sort of temporary worker agreement and signed it but forgot to send it to them (fortunately). Well after the job was over they asked for it and I actually read it. It's atrocious.

Not only is it asking for things like a county, federal and state criminal search and an education verification (i'm okay with that stuff since it's job related) they also want a credit report and 'consumer' report (whatever that is).

The fine print reads: "I consent to have a background investigation made as to my character, professional reputation, employment history, credit history, driving record, educational background, criminal record, personal characteristics, and mode of living."

AND MODE OF LIVING!!! What does that mean???

it goes on: "I am aware that the investigative consumer report I consent to have prepared may include information obtained from interviews with my past or present neighbors, friends, associates, employers, or co-workers, among others, who have or may have information about me"

and then: "I hereby forever release, discharge, exonerate, hold harmless and indemnify CIS Inc, its employees, representatives, agents and subcontractors, and any other person, entity, organization or institution furnishing information to them from any and all liabilities of every nature and kind, including but not limited to claims for libel, slander, invasion of privacy, related tort claims, misuse of information obtained from CIS Inc. and any other claim or cause of action arising out of the furnishing, inspection, or copying of any documents" and so on.

Well of course, no way will I sign the egregious invasion of personal privacy. And as a matter of principle - I believe the more people bend over and sign crap like this the worse our society becomes. But - I've put my agency - who I like working for - in a difficult legal bind by not reading and signing it before working the job.

Any advice? Should I cross out the objectionable parts (most of it)? Should I just say no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC