You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #108: I agree that LHO's rifle did not kill JFK, but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #106
108. I agree that LHO's rifle did not kill JFK, but
IMHO, the "single bullet theory" is one of the weakest points that the lone gunman proponents have to over come.

Once again, on the use of "a look-alike oswald's gun" being used:

According to FBI reports, which can be found in the 26 volumes of Hearings & Exhibits of the WC, the gun found in the TSBD had the following problems; 1) the telescopic sight was loose and had to have shims inserted between the barrel and the sight, 2) the sight itself was found to be "off" (high and to the left), 3) in such condition that the FBI experts were very hesitant to actually fire it in fear that it would cause them harm.

BTW: Many supporters of the WC claim that the fact that the scope was off "helped" LHO shoot accurately.

I do NOT accept that the "heights, distances and orientation of the figures in in car are correct" on these reconstructions. Why? Because in late 1964, while the Warren Report was still undergoing final revision, the limo was returned to the Ford factory in Dearborn, MI and COMPLETELY rebuilt. NO blueprints exist as to the exact placement of the rear seats vs the jump seats where Connelly and his wife were seated. In addition, even if you did have the numbers, placement of the targets would have to match exactly, a difference of as much as 12 inch would be enough to throw the test off (considering the bullet diameter is about 1/4 inch).

Photos of JFK at autopsy time show an "entrance" wound in the back that is LOWER than the "exit" wound in the throat. How could that happen when the shot was fired from "above and behind"? According to the autopsy doctors, there was NO path from the back to the front. One of them found that the bullet appeared to only have traveled the length of his pinkie into the back (he probed it).

As to the reactions on the Z-film, aside from Connelly's cheeks puffing out, there is the fact that he is holding his ten-gallon hat in his right hand during the time that CE#399 is said to be traveling through his right wrist. A wrist that I might add was "shattered" (according to his doctors) by the impact of the bullet.

Finally, I urge you to travel to Dallas yourself. Take a look at Dealy Plaza and go to the TSBD. Look out the window where LHO was supposed to be. And when you do ask yourself why didn't he take the shot as the limo traveled down Houston St towards the TSBD rather than wait until after it had passed onto Elm St.

Yes, the head shot(s) are important, but the single bullet nonsense is the key to understanding what happened that terrible day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC