Reply #9: Citizenspook is spot in THAT post, BUT: [View All]

[yodermon]

He crosses the line of rational argument in his piece TREASONGATE: IN CAHOOTS -- How The White House, Wilson, Novak, Corn and Plame Conspired for Treason.

Wilson, Corn, and Plame? Treason? Pleaze.

excerpt:

Joe Wilson is in cahoots with the Bush Administration along with David Corn, Bob Novak and Valerie Plame Wilson, a cast of spooks who have only just been outed with the writing of this article. They've carefully scripted this entire affair to shield themselves from prosecution for monolithic treasons against US citizens and our military. Treasongate, Rovegate, Leakgate, whatever you want to call it, is, in reality, an intricate version of hide and seek where the "perpetraitors" have been controlling both sides of the game.

He goes on to state that Mr & Mrs Wilson are guilty of treason because

A) Joe has NEVER raised the Espionage Act in his various statements and book; he always falls back on the IIPA. To Citizenspook, NOT suggesting indictments under section 794/793 is evidence of violating the same :crazy:.

B) Valerie (Plame) Wilson posed with her husband on the cover of Vanity Fair. :crazy:

C) David Corn was the first to ask, after the initial Novak article,
"Did Bush officials blow the cover of a U.S. intelligence officer working covertly in a field of vital importance to national security — and break the law — in order to strike at a Bush administration critic and intimidate others?" CS argues that the Novak article never stated that she was "undercover" (just an "agency operative"), therefore, Corn is guilty of espionage for stating such in his article. :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

He then goes on to quote Instapundit and the National Review wingnut talking points that Wilson/Plame are responsible are responsible for her outing, and I refuse to link to such trash. :puke: