You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: The evidence against a conspiracy mostly [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. The evidence against a conspiracy mostly
comes from the Warren Commission and those who agreed with their findings. The trouble is, most of the witnesses to the events that day, had a good part of their testimony ignored and discounted by the WC. Nearly every one of them disagrees with the Warren Commission. Filmed interviews with those witnesses after the WC have shed light on that fact. The Committee on Assassinatin (? Name) came up with findings at odds with the WC. The witnesses testified to events as they saw them and the Warren Commission interpreted their testimony to fit their desired conclusions.

But, the one thing that convinces me that someone else was involved is the emergency room physicians, surgeons, and nurses at the hospital, people who deal in trauma and gunshot wounds. They reported TWO ENTRANCE WOUNDS FROM THE FRONT and the extremely large EXIT wound 4 inches in diameter, that extended from the top of his head to the bottom of his ear and from his ear to the middle of the back of his head. How could those emergency room physicians and surgeons have misinterpreted that?? This one fact totally negates the magic bullet theory for me. I can't understand how the reports of the doctors who originally saw the wounds could be ignored. I can only assume it is the "ostrich syndrome conspiracy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC