Reply #62: A single gunman is not plausible. [View All]

[Octafish]

There are too many wounds, bullet markings, photographic evidence, sound recording evidence, and circumstantial evidince to indicate more than three shots in 6–8 seconds shot from behind. The Zapruder film shows the President was shot from the front.

JFK's clothing indicates he was shot low in the right shoulder blade, yet the Magic Bullet is supposed to rise up through his chest and emerge in a perfectly straight line through his throat, shirt collar and tie and continue at a high velocity on yet another trajectory through Connally's back and out his chest through his wrist and stop in his thigh, from where it fell onto a hospital cart — one upon which neither JFK or Connally used.

Not to bring up any unlikely conspiracy, let alone ballistic science fiction, at precisely the same time journalist Seth Kantor ran into Jack Ruby at Parkland Memorial Hospital. Another person saw Ruby, as well.

Regarding the second Oswald in Mexico City: Identify theft is a good one. So who stole his identity at the car dealership in New Orleans where a number of trucks were purchased using his name? Or who stole his identity at the car dealership in Dallas and took a car and a salesman on a death-defying high speed test drive? Or who went to the gun range and shot his gun and his mouth off, stating soon people would hear of him? Or how about "Oswaldo" who met the intellectual daughter of a prominent Cuban American? There's never enough identity theft.