You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Please offer me your opinion. Help! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. Please offer me your opinion. Help!
Borrowed from another thread, to which I will NOT link (suffice to say: GD2004).

"Regrets that you have to be subjected to those so myopic in their partisanship that they fail to - or just psychologically cannot - recognize either the clearly superior candidate for the GLBT community - or even, for that matter, a good piece of journalism.

"Instead, they rush to playing Board Nanny and screaming Violation of Rule This and Rule That to protect a candidacy that has abjectly and misreably failed. One that deserved to fail from the beginning since had it prevailed, it would have eclipsed any politically mature and reasonable hope of taking back the White House from the Squatter."


What do you all think? Flame bait? I called it so (and since it praised the original post while most others didn't, I said "smells like sock puppet"), and got this reply:

"For me, I smell sniffs of arrogance. Projection. Frustration. And, desperation over a doomed and misreable candidacy.

"Flame Bait? To the contrary, one might confidently suggest that the numerous responses in this thread challenging the right of this member to post this article as this member did - and not debating, at all, the points of the article or of the member's thesis - were the flame bait.

"Indeed, it is a frequently employed tactic of the petulant to set up such challenges in a thread to have that thread then declared "flame bait" and closed by the moderators; hence, achieving the objectives of those wishing to have the thread destroyed since their own inability to intellectually debate the thread's issues precludes dealing with the thread in any other manner. Read: setting up straw men.

"It will be interesting to see just how long it takes to have this thread locked and just how many alerts have been issued. Tragic. Pitiful.

"Sock Puppetry? Yeah, right. The last resort of those without effective debating skills: attack the poster or member with patently absurd characterizations. (Read: Karl Rove)

"A respectful suggestion: try, for once, to find an effective argument. It will be unique in this thread."


My instant reaction was to say "POT TO KETTLE, POT TO KETTLE:" but I refrained.

Now help me: is it just me, or are both of these posts flame bait? I'm here to learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC