You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: umm...that's $17 - 24 billion depending on which reactors they build [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. umm...that's $17 - 24 billion depending on which reactors they build
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:55 PM by jpak
http://a4nr.org/library/economics/02.21.2008-nucleonicsweek

<snip>

The company said the cost for building the two units ranges from $12.1 billion to $17.8 billion for Westinghouse's AP1000, and $16.5 billion to $24.3 billion for General Electric's ESBWR.

FPL spokesman Mayco Villafana said last week that the company reached its cost estimates by revising a 2004 study of overnight costs done by a consortium of companies, led by the Tennessee Valley Authority in coordination with DOE. That study found the cost of building two ABWRs would be $1,611 per kilowatt. In updating those figures for 2007, FPL said, it found that costs for materials, equipment and labor had risen more than 50% by some indexes since 2004.

In its revisions, FPL determined that overnight costs for the power plant island and supporting construction would range from $6.7 billion, or $2,444/kW, to $9.8 billion, or $3,582/kW.

FPL added owner's costs, including security, cooling towers, site work and land costs ranging from $1.27 billion, or $466/kW, to $1.96 billion, or $717/kW. Additionally, FPL estimated transmission costs and allowance for cost risk ranging from $541.7 million, or $198/kW, to $663.6 million, or $242/kW.

<more>

Now.

The 132 MW Kibby Mountain wind farm in Maine will cost $270 million (all costs including a 27 mile transmission line). It will produce 375 million kwh per year (a projected capacity factor of 32% based on on-site wind data).

That's $2045/kW vs. $5780/kW - $8071/kW for FPL's new nukes.

<snip>

FPL then added an 11% carrying charge for construction costs and factored in cost escalation over the scope of the project to reach its final figures of $5,780/kW to $8,071/kW depending on the scope of the project and inflation.

<snip>

$17 billion would buy 8311 MW of new wind capacity...

$24 billion would by 11,733 MW of new wind capacity...

Even accounting for wind capacity factors, wind is cheaper than nuclear.

Way cheaper...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC