You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Another 'redoubtable' "study" from Exxon-Mobil's favorite Petro-University - Stanford. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another 'redoubtable' "study" from Exxon-Mobil's favorite Petro-University - Stanford.


some interesting quotes from article:


"Ginnebaugh worked with Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering, using vehicle emissions data from some earlier studies and applying it to the Los Angeles area to model the likely output of pollutants from vehicles.

Jacobson is the author of an earlier study, that has been criticized for questionable methodology and unrealistic assumptions. Any guesses where the "vehicle emissions data from some earlier studies" came from?????

Ginnebaugh said that they found that E85 had greater emissions under cold weather conditions.

and then elaborated:

"The problem with cold weather emissions arises because the catalytic converters used on vehicles have to warm up before they reach full efficiency. So until they get warm, a larger proportion of pollutants escapes from the tailpipe into the air."


......."until they warm"... now by "warm" what temps are you talkng about? and uh, how long does it take to warm to that temperature? 10 minutes? 15 minutes?... 5 minutes???


oh, and regarding the.... "vehicle emissions data from some earlier studies"... here's a couple comments from a well known critique of Jacobson's 2007 "study"


http://www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/documents/1071/reapresponse_jacobsone85.pdf


"Conflicts with U.S. EPA Analysis and Other Agencies

E85 and other high blend ethanol/gasoline fuels warrant further analysis. However, Jacobson’s study already stands in stark contrast to work done by U.S. EPA, the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)."
~~
~~

"relies on 1991 vehicle data for establishing inputs to the model (there were virtually no cars certified for E85 use in 1991). The report also seems to ignore that formaldehyde emission rates from recent FFV certification results indicate that formaldehyde emissions from both gasoline and E-85 are well controlled by latest catalyst technology, and both fuel / technology combinations provide a substantial margin of compliance with ARB’s strict 15 milligram per mile HCHO (formaldehyde) standard, as shown below:"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Stanford University is the recipient of a $100 million grant from EXXON-Mobil


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC