Reply #45: Er, because they're considered a reputable source? [View All]

[Englander]

Besides, that isn't relevant to the point I've been making, nowhere have I said that Commentary, or
other repug/conservative/neo-con sources shouldn't be used, or should be removed, or are equivalent
to 'Mein Kampf', or are in any way beyond the pale. But, hey, you already knew that.

The point I've been making (which you appear to be denying, that Commentary is a repug/neo-con source
feel free to say if you agree with that evaluation) is that using such sources is going to illicit
an unfavourable reaction of some degree.