Reply #35: I agree with you here (but, with reservation) [View All]

[Grateful for Hope]

I just want to talk about what you said:

I personally think that the truth community would have been much more successful in reaching the US public if they had simply said that the hijackers were CIA patsies that were aided by rouge elements in the US government. A simple case that avoids opening the door to theories like mini-nukes, space based energy weapons, holographic planes, etc.

IMO, there is no way to prove that the WTC was blow up or not, reason being that most evidence was removed, and, more important, the agencies investigating this criminal act were not, by definition, unbiased. And this does continue.

One thing I do want to say, though, is that maintaining that all inqueries into 9/11 necessitate bringing up the most outlandish theories like: mini-nukes, space based energy weapons, holographic planes, etc.

Why the strawman(s), Hack89?