Reply #63: Do you need me to refresh your memory (again)? [View All]

[MercutioATC]

#1)

"Abe Linkman (1000+ posts) Tue Jul-13-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #162

164. The damage is consistent with a small plane, definitely not a 757.

The entry & exit holes alone prove that. Propaganda and disinformation
programs can't change reality. They might influence your perception of it, but that's all."

#2)

"Abe Linkman (1000+ posts) Tue Jul-13-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #166

168. Use your eyes, silly goose. Do YOU see a hole big enough for a 757?

Do YOU see damage to the lawn in front of the Pentagon?
Do YOU see ANY airplane parts that could have come from a 757 (other than the obviously fake one that was planted out on the lawn -- that's such a poor fake it doesn't even have the right colors in the right place)?

If you were being objective or if you knew that people could identify who you are! -- there's NO way you'd claim FL 77 crashed at the Pentagon. There's NO way you'd claim it did that, then disintegrated but kept on going and for its Grand Finale, punched out a near-perfect nine foot circle before collapsing into billions and billions of little tiny bits & pieces of something or other. You wouldn't do that, and we both know it. It's just too crazy. Too bizarre for words.

Stick with what you know: ATC stuff."

#3)

"Abe Linkman (1000+ posts) Tue Jul-13-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7

10. The images from the parking lot camera proves it wasn't a 757.


The only images that HAVE been released proves that FL 77 didn't crash
into the Pentagon...or anywhere else. The parking lot video images show
a small jet shooting a missile just before the plane hits the Pentagon.
That plane is most likely an unmanned F-16.

There's no way the Gov't can afford to release the images from the Sheraton camera or the service station camera...although it might be kind of interesting to see how the Disinfo agents would try and deal with the reality. I think if the images ARE ever released, the "line" will be that the F-16 was sacrificed in the line of duty, and the Gov't will do everything in its power to find the "Evil Doers" who "took over" FL 77 and went to parts now "unknown" (to the public, anyhow)."

#4)

"Abe Linkman (1000+ posts) Mon Jul-12-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #117

119. demodewd: They have a theory for that, too. It's the "magic 757 theory".

It's plausible to cite shaped charges as the source for a jet stream-created exit hole. Claiming that a destroyed 757 could do that makes no sense at all...except to maybe Arlen Spector."



...and that's just from the first page of the 9/11 Forum.


Abe, there IS a search function here, remember?