Reply #18: Holy shit what a who's who of mental illness [View All]

[vincent_vega_lives]

A whole page of ranting self obsession. No-planers attacking planers.

The land of 9/11 is treacherous and the latest tremor was that Gerard Holmgren, a pioneer "no planer" and debater extraordinaire, broke the stunning news that I am "a plane hugger who is pretending to be a no plane proponent."

:wtf:

Here we have scientific equations at their finest:

Obviously the physics about plane break-up would apply to any airplane. Every argument and proof for NBB is identical for all planes (NPT) except the big plane/small hole argument need not apply to small planes. In terms of an equation we have:
NPT = NBB – UH
Or
NBB = NPT + UH
Where
NPT = proof for no plane theory
NBB = proof for no big Boeing
UH = undersized hole relative to airliner

This guy has himself throughly convinced in his physics model.

What about the belief that fragile objects with sufficient speed penetrate massive, hard objects, e.g., tornados allegedly driving straws into trees? This can happen because "intense winds can bend a tree or other objects, creating cracks in which debris (e.g., hay straw) becomes lodged before the tree straightens and the crack tightens shut again."

back to your clam. The hole is there. a video capture is not real life. People's skin doesnt blurr when they move in real life either.