Reply #19: regarding strawman arguments [View All]

[JackRiddler]

I've met a half-dozen people who worked Ground Zero. So what? What I say falls or stands on reason. I've also met the real relatives (as opposed to your theoretical ones) who actually deal with the skyscraper issue, and guess what, they are angry because the investigation wasn't done. Duh.

No one is saying the rubble should have been kept downtown. Your leading with a "public health" irrelevancy and pretending you're not aware of the actual issue isn't very convincing after three years of debates on this board, do you know that?

Clearly, they could have kept a photographic record of everything as it was first dug up for transport to the dump. Then, there was room enough at the city dumps to keep the rubble long enough to allow investigators to find the (labeled!) columns and other pieces from the impact zones. (So what we're reading here from our committed Denialists is bunkum as usual.)

They did not take these easy steps. The steel was all shipped & scrapped post-haste.

Now, for the NIST investigation, one beam fragment remains from the WTC 1 core columns in the impact area. One. This is "representative"?