Reply #25: it WAS "physically investigated"..." [View All]

[petgoat]

Apparently it wasn't because they don't have the steel that failed.

If it's true as people are saying that NIST's mandate is not to find
out what happened, but to suggest improvements to highrise safety,
they are then free to spend all their efforts on suggesting
improvements to fire resistance without investigating whether the
building actually came down by fire. Their report thus serves to
bolster the official story without being burdened by the necessity of
proving it.

I guess they're not going to have a "Project 9" for suggesting ways to
increase building resistance to explosives.

That being the case, it appears that a true investigation of the
causes of collapse was never conducted, just as a 9/11 Commission
Report that refuses to assign blame can not be considered a true
investigation of what happened. History will laugh at these clowns!