You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Hi, Zeke. You're right -- the media now are mostly pro-W. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hi, Zeke. You're right -- the media now are mostly pro-W.
But I mean the historians for the next generation. I do not believe they will look kindly on a U.S. president who launched an attack on a sovereign nation without evidence of the very weapons supposedly prompting the attack.

I think they are going to nail his sorry ass to a board and that he will be lumped in with the Pierce/Harding/Nixon group.

I'm speculating into the future, I realize. But that's my thought on ol' Dubya. I think he's toast in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC