You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Ummm,...... at the risk of being flamed...... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
moggie12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ummm,...... at the risk of being flamed......
Those guys said it pretty stupidly and in an unnecessarily combative way, but I think there may be a kernel of truth in there somewhere -- or at least something to think about a bit.

(I'll wait while everybody hits the alert button............)

Okay, now that you're back, let me lay this stuff on you:

1) I do get the feeling that some anti-war protesters are reflexively anti-war, i.e, that there is no war they'd ever be in favor of. For example, some were against going into Afghanistan, correct?? In my mind, that was an action that needed to be taken. Maybe that's what From et al meant by "being portrayed as the anti-war party in the war on terror"...

2) Now about Michael Moore. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Michael Moore against the Afghan action? (I read a lot of mainstream media so I admit I could be dead wrong about this). Also, the heavy anti-Bush, somewhat conspiratorial tone of F-911 made it a less than persuasive "documentary" in my opinion-- it was more like a political polemic in my mind. More people would have listened to his message (which was a very important one)if he hadn't been so heavy-handed in his approach. As it was, he ended up being the poster boy for the anti-Bush movement, which I think was unfortunate: Anything that sounds extreme is automatically discounted by many Americans who might otherwise be open to a more reasoned approach. Just from a PR standpoint, Moore getting awards at Cannes didn't help either. Like it or not, the French are seen as "socialist sissies" by many Americans. The French lauding Moore didn't help the anti-Bush, anti-war movement's ability to get its message across to Americans and, in fact, probably hurt it.

I'm not a DLC fan (and I thought Peter Beinert's article in the New Republic urging Dems to join in with Bush stupid "crusade" was the worst piece of drivel I've read in years), but somewhere between the two sides (DLC and left) I think there's important issues to talk about. It's very unfortunate that it seems to be turning into a "war".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC