You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: so much for relevance [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. so much for relevance
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 03:03 PM by wyldwolf
Your reply has little - if anything at all - to do with my post. I will say, however, that I agree with 99% of what Matt wrote in the link referenced from your link. I do, however, draw a distinction between being "anti-war" and "anti-Iraq war."

There really aren't many Democrats who are anti-war.

But now back to the issue at hand without getting off track again:

Why not read the links provided and and tell us Sirota wasn't really lying and being deceptive in his piece "Debunking Centrism" - he was just having a bad day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC