You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: Except for a few points, he's quite a liberal; this is his home [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. Except for a few points, he's quite a liberal; this is his home
More than anything else, he's a pro-Israel-regardless-of-anything Orthodox Jew. He's also a tight-assed social moralist in league with the social conservatives. He's also a tool of the insurance industry and almost single-handedly torpedoed real investigation against Enron at a point when the Dems controlled the Senate. For me, what's most despicable is his opportunism in ratfucking Clinton when he was being railroaded by a virulent bunch of reactionaries. This also shows Gore's weakness: he put Lieberman on the ticket simply to distance himself from Clinton after the ginned-up crap of the impeachment; Gore should be ashamed and Lieberman should be derided for his calumny.

His voting record on everything else that liberals (okay, also cowards who're cowed by the right into disavowing that term and who identify themselves as "progressives") is quite good and noble. His votes on the environment, workers' rights, unions, and general fairness are quite honorable and decent.

He's not a Republican. He's a bit of a tool of the insurance industry, but more than anything else, he is so committed to Israel that he'd do anything that helps that state. This brings forth a question of loyalty: to who whom do you truly offer your allegiance? Is it to your country or your religious belief? For Lieberman, it's to his religious belief.

Don't dismiss some of the moral responsibility of this man, but remember that his prime allegiance is to his religion and his tight-assed view of social order. Still, having said this, his attack on Clinton was extreme opportunism, and he's a sanctimonious little prick. For him to become a Republican would be a personal betrayal of beliefs, and I'd be extremely surprised would he to do so. Republicans are selfish and only care about themselves; Lieberman, for all his opportunism and prissy moralistic stances still gives a damn about the common man.

He needs to go away. This needs to be an important lesson for us all, but to boil it down to the simplicity of allegiance is ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC