You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: The blogs can be much worse [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The blogs can be much worse
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 10:07 AM by PATRICK
and they don't make it routinely into every newspaper in the nation like the daily fact report sheet. Blogs ARE opinion, like this one and are editorials at best.

Does it have to be more unsubtle to violate the objectivity of reportage edited down to its barest length but still containing obligatory and customary shots that are too routine to keep ignoring.

Example: "Mayor Bill, dressed in his usual expensive audacious suit, battled the flames behind his own beleaguered firemen on the hose line. After a spark hit his suit he yelped and backed off a moment before seizing the hose again a little further down. Afterward a political adviser commented that he wished Bill had taken off the suit and rolled up his sleeves which would have made for a better picture."

The difference between words framing what they want you to see and feel and opinionated analysis might be mainly where it is read but it is more likely to subconsciously pass on a bias, even a squarely dishonest and planned one. You can indeed find far more outrageous things in blogs but it is the falsity of a new media where there is never a question of response if only because the news clips are not supposed to be opinions or even lengthy enough to critique for the hidden points.

Maybe I am too sensitive by this point but this has been unrelenting with many consistent examples for years. Once you pay attention to the small deliberate details it becomes very annoying and less paranoid than it first seemed because of the mere shortness of the digests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC