Reply #13: If that's true, then that is wrong [View All]

[PurityOfEssence]

That's a disturbing point, and if it's true, it deserves an explanation. If absolutely nothing about poverty was discussed at any of these retreats, then it's wrong.

How many were there? How much of the moneys were used for speaking about poverty and doing legitimate poverty-related work?

Surely you DO see that the gist of the NYT article is that it's all just a sham and he's hiding behind a noble cause to suck money from the unsuspecting to further his own ambition, right?

Few things in life are cut-and-dried, and this may well be one of them. Still, I'd like to hear more about those alleged meetings.