Reply #2: I agree. Besides, Clinton's need to answer a lot of questions. [View All]

[JDPriestly]

One being -- where do they stand on internet privacy. The U.S. government pressured the European Union to start collecting information to enable internet snooping during the late '90s.

Also, what about NAFTA? Hillary's answers to questions about this have been very troubling -- weak, vague, ambiguous. I want to know where she stands on changing laws on ownership of the media also. The first Clinton administration took a right-wing view on a lot of issues. Where does Hillary sand on poverty? What happens to all the people thrown out of the welfare system if we have an economic downturn thanks to Green span's inattention to the economy during the early Bush years? The questions go on and on.

And the rebirth of Whitewater is just one of them. I realize that the Republicans will attack any Democratic candidate. But the voters have already been inoculated with anti-Hillary venom and she is not going to be able to counter-attack that venom. It's there. It is in the subconscious of the voters, and she should not be running. She will damage the Democratic Party and the U.S. Sorry, Hillary. You are qualified. You are competent. But you are too right-wing and you are already hated by too many people.