Protagoras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 06:37 PM
Original message |
Assuming they could ALL get Elected? |
|
Ok, because I'm a bit befuddled by the rancor I see aimed at our own candidates (esp whoever is in the lead on any given month)...and the frequent assertions that anyone who admits to less than idealistic or absolutist positions is some form of sellout...I need to ask the DU community to clarify a couple things for me.
Assuming all 4-5 democratic candidates (however you want to count it) could get elected (thereby removing the concept of electability)...hell assume the Supreme Court is going to appoint whoever DU tells them to....
But republicans continue to control the house and senate...(because by all indications they will).
In the next 4 years...who would be the most effective President? Key word *Effective*.
Knowing they still have to work with the supreme court, still have to appeal to the people, and have to get their bills thru congress and avoid having their Veto's overridden...
Who would be most to least successful in:
Placing progressive supreme court (and other federal court) judges. Helping to regain seats for democrats in the Congress Advancing the cause of Healthcare Coverage for all Americans Increasing primary education support and funding Increasing access and funding for higher education Slowing or stopping the Offshoring of American Jobs Improving our standing in the International Community Reducing violence in the ME Increasing the average wage for workers Increasing empoyment rates/decrease unemployment Providing for/protect retirement/social security for the elderly Reducing the impact of corporate contributions on elections Getting re-elected in 4 years more...
I'm really focused on the terms effective and successful because I'm seeing so much debate between idealism and electability that I think we sometimes lose sight of what is actually going to happen after the election. Do we want a one hit wonder? Do we want a democrat to serve one term that re-polarizes the right to the extent that Bush has polarized the left? Or are we looking for someone who can get in and keep us in a position for positive change for more than 4 years? And if so...what does it really take to get that? How well must we be able to play with others?
Just curious how the DU veterans view it.
:D
|