You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Not necessarily. In this case you shouldn't be counting out the [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not necessarily. In this case you shouldn't be counting out the
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 09:15 PM by FlyingSquirrel
Superdelegates.

Look what's happening.

If my prediction were to come true, Clinton would have 851 Pledged Delegates to Obama's 837 after Super Tuesday.

If, after this, the current percentages of support for each continued to hold true with neither breaking out, well, here are the delegates up for grabs after ST:

Red states: 439
Blue states: 291
Swing states: 644

Current percentages for Clinton/Obama:

Red states: Clinton 36%, Obama 49%
Blue states: Clinton 50%, Obama 39%
Swing states: Clinton 46%, Obama 41%

For the rest of the race, Clinton picks up 600 and Obama picks up 593 under this scenario. There are then 182 other delegates, plus the 122 uncommitted above. That's 304. Suppose Obama gets 55%, Clinton gets 45%. That's 167 for Obama, 137 for Clinton.

Now without Superdelegates, you have the following totals:

Clinton 1588, Obama 1597

Superdelegates then are CRUCIAL. Clinton has the edge here.

I know a lot of my numbers are off but the overall effect is the same. Unless either candidate picks up decisive momentum after Super Tuesday, it may very well come down to 796 people choosing our nominee.

-----

But let's not forget Michigan and Florida. Under this scenario Clinton may successfully argue that her victories in those two states (regardless of the validity of the Michigan vote) should be the deciding factor that gives her the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC