You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Penn's Firm Paid $4.3 Mill By Clinton Campaign (Axelrod's More than $1 Mill) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:31 AM
Original message
Mark Penn's Firm Paid $4.3 Mill By Clinton Campaign (Axelrod's More than $1 Mill)
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 10:34 AM by mod mom
Mark Penn's Firm Paid $4.3 Million By Clinton Campaign
February 6, 2008 03:47 AM


Even if his candidate fails to secure the Democratic nomination, Mark Penn, the chief strategist for Sen. Hillary Clinton, has profited quite handsomely.

Through the course of the primary, Penn's consulting firm, Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates, has been paid more than $4.3 million by the Clinton campaign, according to a review of campaign finance filings.

That total, compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, includes receipts for tasks ranging from polling and consulting to mail expenses and even photography. It does not include the $1.5 million the Clinton campaign is in debt to the firm.

Sen. Barack Obama's chief adviser, David Axelrod, has not done too poorly either. His firm, AKP media (for which Obama's campaign manager David Plouffe also serves) was paid more than $1 million by the Obama campaign, primarily for media activities.

Neither campaign returned requests for comment.

It is not uncommon for candidates to spend their cash on the firms and companies associated with their advisers. And the elongated primary, combined with the historic fundraising totals, have pushed campaign expenditures increasingly higher. Still, the totals taken in by Penn and, to a lesser extent, Axelrod represent significant hauls for a year-plus work

-snip

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/06/mark-penns-firm-paid-4_n_85192.html


SO CLINTON UNWISELY PAYS PENN'S FIRM OVER 4 TIMES AS MUCH TO LOSE HER TOP LEAD STATUS? THIS SOUNDS AS IF THE OBAMA CAMP IS MUCH MORE FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE IN THEIR CHOICE OF AXELROD. WHY WOULD CLINTON HANG ON TO SUCH A REPUGNANT MAN WHOSE UNION BUSTING, AND DEFENSE OF SUCH CORPORATIONS AS BLACKWATER, PHILIP MORRIS, UNION CARBIDE AFTER THE BHOPAL DISASTER, GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS FOR MONSANTO AMONG OTHERS, IS PUBLICLY KNOWN? WHY CHOSE A FIRM THAT GAVE OVER 57% OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GOP IN 2006. IN 2006! WHEN EVERYONE WHO HAD EVEN A LITTLE SENSE KNEW WHAT THEY WERE UP TO?

WHY PROMOTE A FIRM WHO PROTECTS THE POWERFUL OVER THE PEOPLE TO REPRESENT YOU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC