Reply #5: You're exactly right. Each time she falls below in a race, [View All]

[Turn CO Blue]

she'll have to do better and better. And she has to get most of the uncommitted supers. And she has to hope to have MI and FL seated as-is. And she has to hope that some of Obama's delegates will break faith and go for her (unlikely).

It's illogical that she is dragging this out. How does this show us that she has analytical abilities? (I work as a data analyst).

She's going on sheer defiance of the numbers now. Who can make her see reason?

I know that all politicians are blinded by AMBITION (even St. O'bama) but this is the most stubborn, fool-headed, scorched-earth path to destroy the Democratic Party possible.

Is it possible that she doesn't have one advisor who can do analytics? Who is advising her to stay in?

Who benefits? It's scary that they're seem willing to defy MATH, logic and good advice, party leadership advice, eventually good friends' advice to just "do the classy thing and drop out!"

I never really had much of a preference before once Edwards dropped out, but Clinton's ignorance of the numbers is starting to appall me. SHE'll be supposedly able to fix our economic issues with this level of ignorance of numbers and statistics?

===
tcb