You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: Obama Campaign Memo: Voters and Superdelegates Rejecting Clinton’s Tactics [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
25. Obama Campaign Memo: Voters and Superdelegates Rejecting Clinton’s Tactics
Dayum! Go Team!!!

Obama Campaign Memo

TO: Interested Parties

FR: Obama Campaign

RE: Voters and Superdelegates Rejecting Clinton’s Tactics

DA: March 28, 2008

Weeks ago, as Senator Obama began to build momentum in the race for the Democratic nomination, the Clinton campaign put into motion their “kitchen sink” strategy—what one Democratic official called the “Tonya Harding” strategy : say and do anything to make Barack Obama an unacceptable candidate and win over the remaining superdelegates. But as new polling and news reports show, voters and superdelegates are soundly rejecting the Clintons’ tactics.

The Clintons have made no secret of the fact that they relish negative campaigning. Just before the first votes were cast in this race, Senator Clinton called attacking Senator Obama “the fun part.” Earlier this week, during a campaign stop in West Virginia, Bill Clinton signaled that the attacks won’t be letting up anytime soon:

“If a politician doesn’t wanna get beat up, he shouldn’t run for office. If a football player doesn’t want to get tackled or want the risk of an occasional clip he shouldn’t put the pads on.”

There’s just one problem: the only candidate paying a price for Senator Clinton’s desperate attacks is Senator Clinton herself.

How are the voters responding to Clinton’s tactics?

A new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released on Wednesday night shows the extent of the damage that Senator Clinton has suffered in the eyes of voters. As the Wall Street Journal writes, “The negativity of the Obama-Clinton contest seems to be hurting Sen. Clinton more, the poll shows.”

After her latest round of attacks on Barack Obama, Clinton’s overall favorability rating is her lowest of the campaign, showing a significant drop from just two weeks ago. Clinton’s supporters give Obama a net-positive rating, while Obama’s supporters give Clinton a net-negative rating. NBC notes that “Taken together, this appears to be evidence that Obama, intially, should have the easier time uniting the party than Clinton.” In addition, Obama is “still much more competitive with independent voters when matched up against John McCain than Hillary Clinton is.”

Key findings:

Ø Overall Favorability:

Clinton: 37% positive, 48% negative

Obama: 49% positive, 32% negative

Ø Favorability Rating Among Opponent’s Supporters:

Clinton: 35% positive, 43% negative

Obama: 50% positive, 29% negative

Ø Can Unite the Country:

Clinton: 46%

Obama: 60%

Ø Shares Your Values:

Clinton: 43% yes, 57% no

Obama: 50% yes, 39% no

But it’s about the superdelegates now, right?

Given Barack Obama’s lead in pledged delegates and the popular vote, Senator Clinton’s only path to the nomination is to somehow convince uncommitted superdelegates to overturn the will of the voters—and her attacks on Senator Obama in recent weeks appear designed to do just that.

But there is mounting evidence that superdelegates are rejecting the Clinton tactics even more resoundingly than rank-and-file Democratic voters. A new report from NBC shows increasing concern among superdelegates that Clinton’s desperate attacks “are hurting the party and its chances in November, and also say it is showing a calculated, desperate-to-win side of Clinton that they dislike.” One uncommitted superdelegate put it this way:

“A full and fair debate about issues and differences and even fights is good. Mud slinging, personal attacks and lying is never good for any political fight or party. And I see a lot of that coming from one side more than the other.”

Even Paul Begala, one of Senator Clinton’s most public supporters, is critical of the depths to which Clinton has sunk. As he told CNN on Wednesday:

“I criticize Hillary, too. She shouldn’t be saying not qualified to be commander in chief. Of course he is.”

The stakes

After nearly eight years of one of the most disastrous administrations in history, Democrats are adamant about taking back the White House. With the race for the nomination drawing to a close, the Clinton campaign’s scorched-earth tactics only make that goal harder to reach.

http://thepage.time.com/obama-campaign-memo/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC