You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: The sad thing is . . [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-16-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. The sad thing is . .
Edited on Wed Apr-16-08 01:57 PM by nichomachus
it was hers to lose -- and she lost it.

She made several huge blunders.

1. She assumed it would be over by Super Tuesday -- and she had no plan B.

2. The mood of the country had changed -- and she relied on a guy (Penn) who was unaware of that.

3. The campaign totally misread Obama -- they still do -- and didn't know how to counter his appeal to large segments of the voters.

4. She relied too heavily on tactics that worked in the past, but had begun to turn off large segments of the voters.

5. She underestimated the rebound effect of "Clinton Fatigue."

The last one is a phenomenon that few people have picked up on. I compare it to having been in a relationship that ended. You still have some feelings for the other person, and, over time, you begin to remember the good times and forget the bad. So, you decide to try to "make it work." (Many of us have been there.) It doesn't take long, however, for all the bad things to begin to piss you off again and begin to overshadow the good.

I think that's what's happened with Clinton Fatigue. The absolute wretchedness of the Bush years made us pine for the Clinton years -- often forgetting the things that pissed us off back then. (Hell, the Bush years made me pine for the Nixon years.)

Then, once Hillary's campaign began unraveling and things started to not go her way, the campaign began flailing, and that has led to a series of blunders. That's like walking into quicksand. Once you're in, there are only a few things you can do to get out successfully. Continued flailing only gets you in deeper. I suspect that, like Bush, she listened only to her acolytes and inner circle who told her what they thought she wanted to hear. The fact that the country is headed in a different direction still hasn't sunk in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC